Smart Benefits: New FMLA Spouse Definition Now In Effect
Monday, March 30, 2015
The New Definition
Following the Supreme Court decision in United States v. Windsor, which struck down section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) as unconstitutional, the DOL announced the then-current definition of spouse under the FMLA allowed: Eligible employees could take leave under the FMLA to care for a same-sex spouse only if the employee resided in a state that recognized same-sex marriage.
February’s Final Rule revises that definition by using a “place of celebration” rule instead, which means the marriage must be recognized under the state law where the marriage took place so residency of the employee or the state of the employer doesn’t matter. That means eligible employees in legal same-sex marriages can take FMLA leave – regardless of where they live.
The Rule also includes individuals in lawfully recognized same-sex and common law marriages and marriage validly entered into outside the US if they could have been entered into in at least one state.
Same-Sex Spousal Rights
As a result of this change, eligible employees – regardless of where they live – can take:
- FMLA leave to care for their lawfully married same-sex spouse
- Qualifying exigency leave due to their lawfully married same-sex spouse’s covered military service
- Military caregiver leave for their lawfully married same-sex spouse
- FMLA leave to care for their stepchild (child of employee’s same-sex spouse) regardless of the in loco parentis requirement
- FMLA leave to care for a stepparent who is a same-sex spouse of the employee’s parent, regardless of whether the stepparent ever stood in loco parentis to the employee
Effect on Employers
The DOL believes this definitional change will reduce the administrative burden on employers that operate in multiple states or have employees who move between states with different marriage recognition rules since those employers wouldn’t have to consider the laws of the employee’s state of residence in determining FMLA eligibility.
Related Slideshow: Massachusetts Business Rankings
See how Massachusetts stacked up.
Related Articles
- Smart Benefits: When Dental and Vision Don’t Count…Under PPAC, That Is
- Smart Benefits: Obamacare Exchanges: Enrollment Expectations
- Smart Benefits: Deadline Next Week for Health Plan Identifiers
- Smart Benefits: November 15 Key for Individual – and Employer – Health Exchange Enrollment
- Smart Benefits: Supreme Court Will Hear Health Insurance Subsidy Challenge
- Smart Benefits: New IRS Guidance on FTE Look-Back Period
- Smart Benefits: Is Your Wellness Program EEOC-Proof?
- Smart Benefits: Are Skinny Plans Becoming a Big Draw?
- Smart Benefits: Two Regs Issued on Contraceptive Coverage
- Smart Benefits: Remember to Provide SBCs at Open Enrollment – or Pay
- Smart Benefits: Are Double-Digit Premium Increases a Thing of the Past?
- Smart Benefits: Employers Can’t Pay for Purchase of Employees Individual Health Insurance
- Smart Benefits: Serve Up Wellness for the Holidays
- Smart Benefits: Voluntary Benefits Up with Employers and Employees
- Smart Benefits: New Forms for Filing this Tax Season
- Smart Benefits: FLSA Exempt Status Change for Home Care Workers Halted
- Smart Benefits: 8 Reasons to Have an Employee Handbook
- Smart Benefits: Fines for Small Business Premium Reimbursement Delayed
- Smart Benefits: The Employer Mandate Has Arrived
- Smart Benefits: Start 2015 by Planning for Health Reform Changes in 2016
- Smart Benefits: Transitional Reinsurance Enrollment Count Deadline Extended to Dec. 5
- Smart Benefits: Hardship Exemptions from Individual Mandate Published
- Smart Benefits: Consumerism Continues
- Smart Benefits: CMS Issues Proposed Rule on Definition of Spouse
- Smart Benefits: HHS to Up Investigations of Exchanges
Follow us on Pinterest Google + Facebook Twitter See It Read It