| | Advanced Search

 

Monfredo: Former Worcester Public School Member Publishes Book—A professional manual for students and professionals

QCC 50th, Celebrating Students: Ato Howard—A Biomedical Engineering student on the rise

MA Beauty Insider: Pedi Nation – Get the Best Pedicure Ever—A guide to finding a pristine pedi place

Fit for Life: Fail to Plan? Plan to Fail—Plan and prioritize, and you will prevail

Tom Finneran: Running on Envy—America's doctors run the gauntlet of envy

Arthur Schaper: Justina: Still Not Free—The crusade continues

Central MA Up + Comer: Vision Advertising CEO Laura Briere—Meet Central MA's rising stars...

FlyORH: Vote for Worcester in JetBlue Contest—Supporting ORH and JetBlue....

Catch the Moscow Festival Ballet With Your WOO Card—Where will you be WOOing this weekend?

Acclaimed Author Leah Hager Cohen to Give Reading at Holy Cross—Will read from new novel 'No Book but…

 
 

NEW: Mass Medical Society Takes Stance on Physician-Assisted Suicide and Medical Marijuana

Monday, September 17, 2012

 

The Massachusetts Medical Society officially declared its opposition to the November ballot questions on physician-assisted suicide and medical marijuana today.

The Society is a statewide professional association of physicians with over 24,000 members. Today, it outlined its reasons for opposing Questions 2 (Prescribing Medication to End Life) and 3 (Medical Use of Marijuana), and indicated that in understood the significance of these questions.

“These are important health care questions for the state,” said Richard Aghababian, M.D., the Society’s president. “And patients deserve to know what we think and where we stand on these issues.”

The Society's opposition statements can be found below.

MMS Opposition to Question 2: Prescribing Medication to End Life

The Society’s stand against Question 2, Dr. Aghababian said, is based on the idea that physician-assisted suicide is fundamentally incompatible with the physician’s role as healer. He also said that predicting a person’s end of life within six months, as the ballot question states as a requirement, is difficult, as such predictions can be inaccurate. Many times patients who are expected to die within months have outlived their prognosis, sometimes for years.

Dr. Aghababian added that the ballot question also lacks provisions to ensure that patients are protected from making uninformed decisions and protected from being coerced into making the decision to end his or her life.

MMS Opposition to Question 3: Medical Use of Marijuana

The Medical Society clearly stated its opposition to medical marijuana when its House of Delegates adopted its current policy in May at the organization’s annual meeting.

Dr. Aghababian said claims for marijuana’s medical effectiveness have not been scientifically proven because it has not been subjected to the same rigorous, scientific testing as other drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration. He also cited the health risks posed by marijuana, as the contents of marijuana smoke are more poisonous than tobacco smoke and its use has been associated with long-term impairment of mental capacity.

The Society’s policy states that “Until such time that scientific studies demonstrate its safety and efficacy, the Massachusetts Medical Society opposes the legalization of medicinal marijuana and cannot support legislation intended to involve physicians in certifying, authorizing, or otherwise directing persons in the area of medicinal marijuana outside of clinical trials.”

The policy also includes a statement that advocates for the reclassification of marijuana by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration so that its potential medicinal use by humans may be further studied and potentially regulated by the Food and Drug Administration, as well as language that supports the development of non-smoked, reliable delivery systems for cannabis-derived and cannabinoid medications for research purposes.

More information on the Society’s positions on ballot questions is available online here for Question 2 and here for Question 3.

 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

Comments:

Stephen Quist

MMS playing politics and being deceitful with the voters and residents of the Commonwealth - SHAMEFUL!
MMS has no bearing nor any right to tell a family how their loved ones may pass away - the choice to die with dignity is solely the family right to make that decision and not a bunch of whitecoats far removed from the immediate family
Medical marijuana has been shown and proven in tests after tests to alleviate the suffering of those afflicted with certain medical conditions.......relying on the FDA is an absolute joke.
I wonder how much added costs to healthcare members that are served by members of the MMS have cost taxpayers in this state?
I wonder how many of the members of MMS have overcharged the GOVT/taxpayers for needless examines and services?




Write your comment...

You must be logged in to post comments.