Welcome! Login | Register
 

Monfredo: A Follow-Up With More Suggestion to Stop Chronic Absenteeism—In a follow-up to my article on chronic…

Fit For Life: Jobs—In these times, so many people are looking…

Leonard Moorehead, The Urban Gardener: Patience is Virtuous—Good grief, will the snow ever melt?

MA Beauty Expert: Choosing a New Spring Raincoat—Gone are the days when spring meant a…

Sharks Net 6 Goals, Down IceCaps 6-3—Sharks beat IceCaps 6-3 at DCU Center

Huestis: Reason for the Season(s)—Folklore tells us that March comes in like…

Simon Kidgits Club Book Blast to be Held at Auburn Mall on March 3—Auburn Mall will host Simon Kidgits Club's Book…

Leonard Nimoy, Spock of Star Trek, Has Died at 83—"We are assembled here today to pay final…

Friday Financial Five – February 27, 2015—Economic conditions have propelled a transition from owning…

Five Live Music Musts - February 27, 2015—Here are five live music performances that you…

 
 

NEW: Massachusetts Named #15 Best in US For Animal Protection Laws

Thursday, January 03, 2013

 

The latest ranking of states by the Animal Legal Defense Fund places Massachusetts at #15.

Massachusetts takes reasonably good care of its animals, having just been named the #15 Best State in the US for Animal Protection Laws, according to the Animal Legal Defense Fund in its 2012 report.

Illinois was ranked the best state for animal protection for the 4th year in a row, according to the organization. Rounding out the Top 5 in the US were Maine at #2, California at #3, Michigan at #4, and Oregon at #5.

On the other end of the spectrum, the worst states for animals' rights were New Mexico at #46, South Dakota at #47, Iowa at #48, North Dakota at #49, and at the very bottom of the list, Kentucky at #50.

How They Got The Rankings

In total, 56 jurisdictions were assessed and ranked based on each state's (as well as the District of Columbia and US territories') cumulative scores to 42 study questions covering 15 distinct animal protection laws categories.

The report analyzed enacted laws only and did not review the separate issue of how these laws are enforced. The questions were limited to the following categories:
1. General prohibitions
2. Penalties
3. Exemptions
4. Mental health evaluations & counseling 5. Protective orders
6. Cost mitigation & recovery
7. Seizure/impoundment
8. Forfeiture and post‐conviction possession
9. Non‐animal agency reporting of suspected animal cruelty 10. Veterinarian reporting of suspected animal cruelty
11. Law enforcement policies
12. Sexual assault
13. Fighting
14. Offender registration
15. “Ag gag” legislation

National trends for 2012

The “Best Five” states remained the same in 2012 for the fifth consecutive year (in different orders), with Illinois holding strong as the top jurisdiction for animal protection. California rose from #5 to #3, in part, by strengthening its forfeiture and seizure laws this year, ensuring that fewer animals unnecessarily languish in cages during the disposition of criminal cases—at shelter expense—and do not return to their abusers. Idaho was the most‐improved jurisdiction in 2012, jumping 8 places in rank and elevating out of the notorious “Worst Five” tier, in part, by enacting its first felony provisions for cruelty, neglect, abandonment and cockfighting.

(Mississippi received a similar boost in rank in 2011 for passing its first felony laws.) North and South Dakota now remain the only jurisdictions without felony penalties for animal abusers, contributing to these states’ longtime positions in the “Worst Five” tier. For the sixth year in a row, Kentucky ranked the weakest state for animal protection.

For more information, go to aldf.org for additional information, including the ANIMAL PROTECTION LAWS OF THE USA & CANADA (SEVENTH EDITION). Contact [email protected] for any report‐related questions or comments.

 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.