Welcome! Login | Register
 

Horowitz: Americans Blame President Trump for Shutdown—Horowitz: Americans Blame President Trump for Shutdown

Holy Cross Falls to Bucknell 93-78—Holy Cross Falls to Bucknell 93-78

Worcester’s Salas Named Home Loan Specialist at Fidelity Bank—Worcester's Salas Named Home Loan Specialist at Fidelity…

Pianist Simone Dinnerstein to Perform at Hanover Theatre—Pianist Simone Dinnerstein to Perform at Hanover Theatre

10 Great Pets in Need of Loving Homes - January 15, 2019—10 Great Pets in Need of Loving Homes…

Inaugural Worcester Preservation Award Winners Announced—Inaugural Worcester Preservation Award Winners Announced

NEW: Patriots Roll Chargers 41-28, Advance to AFC Championship Game—NEW: Patriots Roll Chargers 41-28, Advance to AFC…

Smart Benefits: Planning on Summer Interns? Know the DOL Rules—Smart Benefits: Planning on Summer Interns? Know the…

When the White House Becomes a Prison—Sunday Political Brunch January 13, 2019—When the White House Becomes a Prison --…

What to Watch For: Chargers vs Patriots - AFC Divisional Round—What to Watch For: Chargers vs Patriots -…

 
 

Angiulo: Drunk Driving Charges and Commercial Driver’s License Suspensions

Monday, August 03, 2015

 

Sometimes the worst part about going on probation isn't the monthly fees or the classes, but rather the collateral consequences. This term refers to all those things that change in your life because of a plea to a criminal charge.  When it comes to the offense of Operation Under the Influence, known as an OUI, the number one collateral consequence is the loss of a drivers license.  

Sales people with customers to visit, or anyone whose commute is farther than a bike ride, will feel some pressure if they lose their license.  There may, however, be ways to make their situation manageable during their suspension.  For people who have commercial drivers licenses (“CDLs”) there is typically nothing except driving in their job description.

The Supreme Judicial Court's decision of Tirado v. Board of Appeal on Motor Vehicle Liability Policies and Bonds serves as reminder that CDL holders that make money by driving really need to avoid drunk driving charges.  The question presented by the Tirado case was whether, or not, a continuance without a finding on an OUI charge triggers the heightened license suspensions applicable to CDLs.  

A continuance without a finding, also known as a CWOF, is a common way to resolve a criminal case in Massachusetts.  In that situation, a defendant admits to facts sufficient to find them guilty, but the court places that person on probation without a conviction entering.  If the defendant successfully completes their probationary term, the charge will be dismissed.

When it comes to OUI cases, the legislature has chosen to carve a distinction between the avoidance of a conviction in the criminal realm from the impact of a CWOF on a drivers license.  The laws applicable to OUI make it clear that even if you get a continuance without a finding for a first offense you will still have a license loss.  When it comes to CDLs there is an even higher price to pay for this type of indiscretion.

The Tirado decision looked at the statutes applicable to CDLs and decided that a CWOF will trigger a one year loss for first offenses and a lifetime loss for subsequent offenses of OUI.  This interpretation will apply whether, or not, the defendant was driving a commercial vehicle at the time they were charged.  The issue focused more on the underlying safety concern rather than the facts of a particular OUI case.  

The court's decision was informed by the public safety concerns presented by commercial vehicles and operators who are under the influence. In addition, the justices looked at the various federal provisions dealing with CDLs in ruling that these laws were passed to achieve the goal of restricting access to this type of license because of those public safety concerns. While some people would see this as a plain language reading of a statute, not everyone may agree.  Instead, some might see this decision as letting purpose override a failure in the text of a law. For legal scholars this type of debate can incite some strong arguments.  For the average person it is more of a reality they must account for when they are out at summer barbeques.    

Leonardo Angiulo is an Attorney with the firm of Glickman, Sugarman, Kneeland & Gribouski in Worcester handling legal matters across the Commonwealth. He can be reached by email at [email protected]   

 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

 
Delivered Free Every
Day to Your Inbox