Angiulo: Was Worcester’s Weekend Sobriety Roadblock Constitutional?
Monday, August 05, 2013
What are your rights?
In order to place this situation in context, keep in mind that ordinarily police cannot stop your car for no reason. The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article 14 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights frown upon that sort of thing. In Massachusetts, the rationale is that it is okay, and Constitutional, for sobriety checkpoints to occur because everyone on the road gets stopped, not just individuals at the discretion of the officers on duty that night.
Now, there are two distinct reactions to the words “Massachusetts State Police” and “Sobriety Checkpoints.” On the one hand are people who say that this is an important tool in protecting the public from drunk drivers. And on the other hand are people that are pretty sure this is an example of warrantless search and seizure ordinarily reserved for militarized countries and fascist nations. If you believe you fall into that second category, nothing I say next about Supreme Court decisions or objective standards and policies for officers will likely change your mind. No matter your belief, it's important to know what's happening and what, if any, legal explanation there is for the actions.
Picture yourself leaving a bar on Saturday night
Imagine this . . . there you are leaving your favorite drinking establishment and you point your car towards home. You take the same roads you've taken since you were driving home from soccer practice as a kid. However, instead of orange slices you have been consuming tasty alcoholic beverages. Maybe you've been careful; maybe you haven't had too much. But when the bright flood lights of a Massachusetts State Police Sobriety Checkpoint appear on the roadway in front of your car, the Trooper won't know for sure how many you've had. The only thing that he or she can know is that they can smell liquor on you. To restate, the process goes like this: a) you drive down a street, b) law enforcement has a roadblock set up in front of you, c) after waiting in line you speak with the screening officer, d) after that conversation you are either directed into the interview area or told to drive on, and e) if you are directed into the interview area you are asked to perform field sobriety testing and offered a breath test.
A warrantless seizure? Yes.
For a freeze frame, there is no question that the moment your vehicle is stopped at a roadblock a warrantless seizure of you and your car has occurred. Not only is this a warrantless seizure, but at that point it is a seizure without any evidence of wrongdoing. As recently as 2009, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled in Commonwealth v. Robert Murphy that sobriety checkpoints are distinct from suspicionless traffic stops, which are unconstitutional, because of the objective standards used, the minimal intrusion on operators and the importance of limiting the damage caused by drunk drivers. Consider the logic here: it's okay to conduct warrantless seizures without suspicion so long as everyone on the road is being stopped. Interestingly, this exception to the general rule of the Fourth Amendment is currently limited by to the search for illegal aliens and drunk drivers.
In a case from 2000, Commonwealth v. Hector Rodriguez, the Supreme Judicial Court considered whether or not to expand the use of roadblocks to combat drug trafficking and other items like illegal firearms. The court decided roadblocks could not be used for such searches because it was too much like the broad powers of the British over colonial Americans that the Fourth Amendment and Article 14 were designed to prevent. In addition, the court stated the danger of drunk drivers was a direct danger and the harm of contraband like drugs was too far removed from its presence in cars to justify the use of similarly styled roadblocks. This ruling was based, in part, on the historical context of our state and federal constitutions and the importance of preserving individual's rights to be free from arbitrary searches and seizures.
Worth it for public safety?
And here we have the problem for many people. The court is saying drunk drivers are so dangerous that we are suspending the Constitution to address this threat. But don't worry, we're doing it to everyone equally so it's okay. Some people have a real problem with justifying the elimination of a fundamental Constitutional principle by saying “it's not just you, no one in this situation has this right anymore.” And on the other side, we have people that strongly believe drunk driving is an endemic threat to public safety and the government has an obligation to protect us.
Related Articles
- Leonardo Angiulo: ‘Self-Defense’ and Massachusetts Law
- Leonardo Angiulo: Parents’ Ability to Get a Restraining Order to Protect Their Kids
- Leonardo Angiulo: The Importance of Filling out Financial Statements in Probate Court
- Leonardo Angiulo: Wicked Bad Storms and Eminent Domain
- Leonardo Angiulo: A New Law That Will Let You Have More E-Privacy
- Leonardo Angiulo: Putting A Price On Wrongful Death
- Leonardo Angiulo: The Royal Baby + Your Estate Planning
- Leonardo Angiulo: Aaron Hernandez Should Probably Lawyer Up
- Leonardo Angiulo: Recent Antitrust Lawsuit Protects Our Access to Beer
- Leonardo Angiulo: This Is Our City, You Play By Our Rules
- Leonardo Angiulo: Changes on the Horizon for Crime Scene Investigation
- Leonardo Angiulo: Something To Be Proud Of On Independence Day
- Leonardo Angiulo: Two Supreme Court Rulings That Seem Like Sci-Fi
- Leonardo Angiulo: Criminal Justice—What The TV Shows Leave Out
- Leonardo Angiulo: Surviving Party Season With Your Teenager
- Leonardo Angiulo: What Happens To Digital Property When You Die?
- Leonardo Angiulo: Did Worcester’s City Solicitor File Strategic Litigation Against Public Policy?
- Leonardo Angiulo: Swearing To Tell The Truth Means Something
- Leonardo Angiulo: What You May Not Know About The DOMA Decision
- Leonardo Angiulo: How Much Privacy Did You Lose This Week? A Lot.
- Leonardo Angiulo: The Difference Between MA Law and Oscar Pistorius’ Bail Hearing
- Leonardo Angiulo: What’s Next For America’s Voting Rights Act
- Leonardo Angiulo: How To Survive Tax Day (and Stay Out of Jail)
- Leonardo Angiulo: The Governor’s Authority to Issue a Travel Ban
- Leonardo Angiulo: Why You Should Think Twice Before Secretly Recording With Your Cellphone
Follow us on Pinterest Google + Facebook Twitter See It Read It