| | Advanced Search


Tom Finneran: Running on Envy—America's doctors run the gauntlet of envy

Arthur Schaper: Justina: Still Not Free—The crusade continues

Central MA Up + Comer: Vision Advertising CEO Laura Briere—Meet Central MA's rising stars...

FlyORH: Vote for Worcester in JetBlue Contest—Supporting ORH and JetBlue....

Catch the Moscow Festival Ballet With Your WOO Card—Where will you be WOOing this weekend?

Acclaimed Author Leah Hager Cohen to Give Reading at Holy Cross—Will read from new novel 'No Book but…

NEW: Michael Graham Taking Conservative Talk Show to Atlanta—Headed for a warmer climate

NEW: Worcester’s Wormtown Brewery Wins Denver Int’l Beer Award—A major honor bestowed to a local brewery

Paul Giorgio: Elizabeth Warren is Right on Student Loans—MINDSETTER Paul Giorgio examines the student debt crisis

Central MA College Standout: Smith College’s Megan Baker—Spotlight on a bright student...


Fiscal Cliff Could Mean $2,200 More in Taxes for Worcester Families

Wednesday, November 21, 2012


Economists said the impending fiscal cliff, which will increase taxes and cut federal spending, may hit the Commonwealth's economy harder than other states and the average family could see their taxes increase by around 20 percent.

Unless Congress can pass a budget deal by the end of December, the first days of January 2013 will bring much more than just a new year to Massachusetts residents. The Bush-era tax cuts of 2000 and 2002, as well as the payroll tax cut of 2010 are all set to expire on the first of the new year in what some have termed "Taxmageddon."

In addition, mandatory budget cuts to federal discretionary spending in both defense and non-defense sectors would kick in as part of the sequestration measures included in the Budget Control Act of 2011.

Mass Effects

According to Robert Nakosteen, a professor at UMass-Amherst's Isenberg School of Management and executive editor of the economic journal MassBenchmarks, the Commonwealth will feel negative effects from both sides of the fiscal cliff. The tax increases, which will take money out of everyone's hands, will lead to less retail sales and less consumer spending thereby having a depressing effect on the Massachusetts economy.

The spending cuts due to sequestration, half of which will affect defense spending, will also have a direct negative effect on the Bay State, said Nakosteen.

"The effect on the state would be disproportionately large compared to other states because of the large amount of defense spending, especially in high-tech areas."

Defense companies in Massachusetts generate nearly $9 billion in payroll each year and more than $3 billion in tax revenue, according to a 2010 report by the UMass Donahue Institute for Economic & Public Policy Research.

If the state economy slows down due to decreased consumer spending and cuts in federal contracts to defense firms, state tax revenues will take a hit as well, which is where municipalities will feel the effects of the fiscal cliff the most.

"Maybe the most important source of local funding is intergovernmental transfers," Nakosteen said. "Any time state tax revenues decline, those transfers come under threat."

Victor Matheson, an associate professor of Economics at Holy Cross, said the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has estimated that going over the fiscal cliff will result in about $400 billion in additional taxes.

"That's going to be around a 20 percent increase in the typical person's tax bill," he said.

"If we put that in terms of a typical Worcester family of four earning about $60,000 a year, they can expect their tax bill to rise about $2,200 for the year."

Another issue that Matheson pointed out was the end to the so-called "doc fix" for Medicare. In an attempt to rein in healthcare costs, Medicare has lower payments for doctors built into its payment structure. The doc fix fills in the gap. Without it, doctors at UMass Memorial or St. Vincent could see lower reimbursements for the treatment of Medicare patients.

The View From the Edge

While the CBO has said that if all the provisions of the fiscal cliff go into effect, it would be sufficient to send the national economy back into recession and send the unemployment rate up over 9 percent, Matheson is decidedly more optimistic.

"My sense is that this is an easy thing to fix."

If lawmakers allow all the tax cuts to expire on January 2, they can still come back on January 3 and vote for new tax cuts to balance them out.

"A week of higher payroll taxes isn't going to hurt anybody," said Matheson.

At the same time, a number of the sequestration measures, including the cuts to defense spending, are set to phase in fairly slowly over time and may not have any large immediate effects.

"Fiscal cliff is probably the wrong term," he said. "It's more like a fiscal slope."

Democrats may have the upper hand on Republicans, who have refused a deal to raise taxes on individuals making over $250,000 a year, when they step to the negotiating table in the coming weeks, and Lieutenant Governor Tim Murray was confident earlier this week that the fiscal cliff could be averted if Congress is willing to take the necessary action.

"The American people voted to keep moving forward and they voted for action," he said in reference to President Barack Obama's reelection.

"This includes working together to deliver a real solution to address the deficit. President Obama has proposed a fair and balanced approach – including asking those who earn more to pay their fair share, and extending tax cuts for families making less than $250,000 a year. This approach makes sense and would prevent taxes from going up for 98 percent of Americans and 97 percent of all small businesses. I urge Congress to act quickly to reach an agreement.” 


Related Articles


Enjoy this post? Share it with others.


Iron Mike Farquhar

But,...but...Worcester residents LIKE massive federal spending and BIG GOVERNMENT programs.

Worcester and Central Mass residents absolutely ADORE the idea of higher taxes, - on the RICH of course, but on EVERYBODY!

Why ELSE would they have voted to return Jim McGovernment to Congress all these 8 times? He is one of the leading architects of the cliff! He's ALWAYS got another way to spend your money.

Why should you get to keep your money when really smart politicians like McGovernment know so much better?

Edward Saucier

About those "Bush tax cuts." If I remember correctly, and I'm sure I do, "W" said that the money from the Clinton budget surplus wasn't the governments money it was our money, ergo "the Bush tax cuts."

If I also remember correctly, and I'm sure I do, things were OK going forward, tax wise, before "the Bush tax cuts." But now it seems the country will fall apart if "the Bush tax cuts" go back into effect. Give me a break, the Clinton tax years produced a lot of millionaires and billionaires.

I can remember back in the 1950s, when Elvis was the King, and the top marginal tax rate for individuals was 91% and some people still got rich and some got richer. It wasn't always that high, in fact during the depression in 1932, which is similar to the present condition, the top marginal tax rate was increased from 24% to 63% and kept going up. All the time the rich got richer and the middle-class was born.

Besides Obama wants to increase taxes for the wealthy and not the middle class and below. So if some of the people went back to the Clinton tax years many will not pay the highest tax rate, same as they don't do now, and the rich will still get richer.

Even the rich know we have to increase taxes for revenue increases, but we still have the "clown show" in the comment section like Iron Mike who know nothing about economics and cannot even prepare his own tax returns, that is if he pays any tax at all.

Iron Mike Farquhar

You need to lay off the sauce Ed. Unfounded personal attacks on me will not solve our nation's fiscal and moral problems.

Obama wants to tax everybody with an income over $250K.

THAT means almost every small businessman and small local merchant – many which are family businesses – where the whole family works.

Your seething hatred of rich [aka hard-working successful] people and shrewd investors makes you sound more like a Lenin, a Stalin, a Mao, or a Castro than an American. And,...it makes you sound a bit unbalanced.

Do you really think YOU represent the mainstream of Massachusetts Democrats?

Edward Saucier

Iron Mike say: Obama wants to tax everybody with an income over $250K.

It should read Obama wants to tax everybody with taxable income over $250K with a higher marginal tax rate. The income they make under $250K will be taxed at the same rate as those making less than $250K.
Which will not include "almost every small businessman and small local merchant" etc.

Making statements that the rich will get richer is not an indication of hatred, it's factual. It's the way it is and always will be. You seem to be suffering from some kind of mental problem and are unable to comprehend things.

Now, do you pay income taxes? Do you prepare your own income tax returns? Here's your chance to make my unfounded statements founded.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.