Welcome! Login | Register
 

Friday Financial Five - September 19, 2014—A positive report out of the New York…

The Cellar: Two Wines You Should Always Have On Hand—This week’s wines are two bottles you should…

What To Watch For: Patriots vs. Raiders—The Patriots will finally play their home opener…

Attend stART on the Street with Your Woo Card—The weekend is fast approaching, and GoLocalWorcester brings…

Worcester Art Museum Begins Construction on New Access Bridge—Construction has begun on a new accessible walkway…

Dear John: No Affair. And Maybe No Friendship.—Was she wrong to tell her friends?

Davis Advertising Debuts Blog about Marketing to Millennials—Davis Advertising will take an in-depth look at…

BBB Warns Consumers of Online Retailer, shopZoey.com—Better Business Bureau is warning consumers about shopZoey.com,…

Smart Benefits: Are Double-Digit Premium Increases a Thing of the Past?—A new study on employer health benefits from…

College Admissions: Which New England Grads Make 6 Figures?—As more attention from the federal government focuses…

 
 

Guest MINDSETTER™ Richard Davey: Massport is committed to Worcester

Tuesday, August 07, 2012

 

There is a simple answer to the question raised in the August 3 story, “Is Massport Mothballing Worcester Airport to Protect Logan Revenues?

No.

As Chair of the Massport Board of Directors, I can assure your readers that the Board and the Patrick-Murray Administration are fully committed to Worcester Regional Airport and taking all steps necessary to encourage and secure expanded commercial service to that facility.

It is in the best interests of the Commonwealth, Massport, and, most important, the air traveling public to support successful and financially sustainable operations at both Boston Logan International and Worcester Regional Airports.

Since purchasing the facility in 2010, Massport has worked to attract commercial service to the airport. For example, the Board in June approved an incentive program for the next three years that will waive landing fees for new service for two years and provide marketing assistance for each flight destination offered.

Massport has also spent $9 million in projects on the airport with another $8 million planned through 2016. In addition, Retrix Aviation will spend almost $7 million in private funds to build a facility at the airport to support general and corporate aviation.

Regardless of different fee structures at the two airports, there is no financial trade off to be considered. We can maintain and grow our Logan service levels AND bring service to the Worcester facility, in some cases attracting travelers who otherwise would use out-of-state airports or make different transportation choices.

As my colleague on the Massport Board Fred Mulligan stated, it will in fact benefit Massport financially in a significant way when commercial air service is restored in Worcester. We are maintaining a first class airport facility with the intention of seeing it put to maximum use for the taxpayers of the region. This priority is completely separate from Massport’s initiatives to expand service and realize the potential of Logan.

To be clear, no one at Massport or as a member of the Massport Board has ever suggested that we should manage the future of the Worcester Airport to save money for our Logan operations. That would contradict our mission to operate both airports to the best of our ability and their potential.

I speak for the Massport Board, Governor Patrick, and Lieutenant Governor Murray in stating that on our watch, aggressive efforts are ongoing and will continue to make the vision of a busy and vibrant Worcester Regional Airport become a reality.

 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.