| | Advanced Search

 

Tom Finneran: Running on Envy—America's doctors run the gauntlet of envy

Arthur Schaper: Justina: Still Not Free—The crusade continues

Central MA Up + Comer: Vision Advertising CEO Laura Briere—Meet Central MA's rising stars...

FlyORH: Vote for Worcester in JetBlue Contest—Supporting ORH and JetBlue....

Catch the Moscow Festival Ballet With Your WOO Card—Where will you be WOOing this weekend?

Acclaimed Author Leah Hager Cohen to Give Reading at Holy Cross—Will read from new novel 'No Book but…

NEW: Michael Graham Taking Conservative Talk Show to Atlanta—Headed for a warmer climate

NEW: Worcester’s Wormtown Brewery Wins Denver Int’l Beer Award—A major honor bestowed to a local brewery

Paul Giorgio: Elizabeth Warren is Right on Student Loans—MINDSETTER Paul Giorgio examines the student debt crisis

Central MA College Standout: Smith College’s Megan Baker—Spotlight on a bright student...

 
 

MA Public Pension Costs Among Nation’s Highest

Saturday, December 01, 2012

 

The Commonwealth's public employees contribute an average of 10 percent of their salaries to the state's pension programs, one of the highest contribution rates in the country.

While many groups feel that the Massachusetts public pension system, which includes 105 public pension funds, is well-run and well-regulated, its price tag can still be staggering. As of 2010 financial reports, the state's 105 retirement boards had combined pension liabilities of over $92 billion, nearly $31 billion of which remained unfunded, according to a study by the Pioneer Institute, an independent think tank in Massachusetts.

Employees Contributing More

Reforms have been passed to attempt to close that gap, but, said Shawn Duhamel, legislative liason for the Retired State, County and Municipal Employees Association of Massachusetts, an increased portion of the burden of pension liabilities has fallen to the employees themselves.

"Our biggest concern is the amount of money today's active employees are being required to pay into this system," he said.

According to Duhamel, public employees pay an average of 10 percent of their slary into the pension system. For teachers, the contribution is set higher at 11 percent, and State Troopers pay the highest rate at 12 percent of their salaries.

"I don't think there's anybody that's comfrotable with such a high level of contribution," he said.

In comparison, teachers in New Jersey, which also recently underwent pension reform, will see their contribution rate phased up incrementally between now and 2018 from 6.5 percent to 7.5 percent. State police in the Garden State contribute to their pensions at a rate of 9 percent. In Maryland, a state often compared to Massachusetts in terms of size and population, teachers and state employees contribute 7 percent of their salaries to pension funds, and state police contribute 8 percent.

"The problem Massachusetss had was we were late to the game," he explained. "It wasn't until the late 1980s that municipalities started to put aside their share for the pension system."

Finding the Funds for Public Pensions

Jim Stergios, executive director at the Pioneer Institute, which is in the process of releasing a 10-part series of research reports on state and local pensions in the Commonwealth, said the high contribution rates in Massachusetts are unlikely to change anytime soon.

In order to keep those rates from rising any higher and to decrease the state's unfunded liability, Stergios and his colleagues produced a number of suggestions in their most recent study to improve the investment policies for the 105 public pension funds in order to increase returns.

“Massachusetts public-employee pension funds have been chronically underfunded,” Stergios said. “There are two ways to fix that: Increase annual payments, which would eat into funding for other priorities, or improve investment returns. While improving investment returns will not address the gap between moneys going in and payments going out to pensioners, it is a critical way to reduce taxpayers’ exposure.”

The Pioneer Institute's recommendations include adopting and updating a system of benchmarks based on appropriate peer funds, moving away from volatile asset classes such as commodities and boosting transparency of the decision-making process at the Public Employee Retirement Administration Commission (PERAC), which oversees the funds.

"We haven't performed poorly in Massachusetts in local pensions overall," said Stergios, "but we're leaving quite a bit of value on the table."

Joseph Connarton, executive director at PERAC, said that a number of the changes the Pioneer Institute's report calls for have already been implemented as part of the pension reform that was recently passed in the state legislature.

"I think people are aware that benefits are expensive, there's no doubt about it," he said. "There is a tremendous effort to look at all possible cost-containment initiatives."

Connarton said that additional recommendations on pension and healthcare reform will be forthcoming sometime in 2013, and they may involve changes to the classification structure of employees and the disability structure.

Duhamel said Mass Retirees is also very concerned about the lack of an adequate cost of living adjustment (COLA) for public workers.

"It's really a struggle for retirees to keep up with inflation," he said. "That's something we're constantly working on."

For Stergios, one glaring issue is the expected return on investment for state and local pension funds. Many officials are projecting returns of around 8 percent, but Stergios said that figure may be unrealistic when private sector investment funds are projecting returns of 4 to 5 percent over the next decade.

"Let's try to find some constructive ways to bump up that investment return." 

 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

Comments:

Iron Mike Farquhar

This is a self-inflicted wound.

Mass voters kept electing SpendoCrats – who faithfully kept passing programs to add to the payroll.

AND, they made sure ALL their friends and relatives were on the payroll.

And THEN, as soon as the next election dust had settled, - they claimed the voters had just given a MANDATE to do more.

In our schools, every kid who has a nervous tick has their own 'special needs assistant'. Some truly need them, others – not so much. And don't forget all those special needs bus drivers...

$103 Billion state debt, grossly underfunded pension and retirement health funds, - - yet EVERY TWO YEARS the voters act as if a ballot was a name recognition test.

When Mass finally rolls over in bankruptcy, NOBODY across America will be in any mood to watch us get a bail-out. They'll say: “They did it to themselves!”

Edward Saucier

Lot of things left out. Those in the Public Pension Fund do not make Soc.Sec. contributions. And unlike Soc. Sec. they have higher contribution rates and do not have a cap. The end result is the Public Funds have a much larger payout. The unfunded liability may keep increasing because the interest rates are very low. This results in a low payout from T-bonds and Muni-bonds used to pay retirees. The Funds growth will depend on the stock market and the expertise of the advisors to invest in the right sectors of the economy that are growing and that isn't an easy job.

Most people haven't a clue how pensions funds are supposed to be run which is obvious from the first comment made by the guy who can't even prepare his own income tax forms.

Don Carlos

Keep the public FAT,HAPPY, AND IGNORANT.




Commenting is not available in this channel entry.