Mattiello Cites GoLocal Poll in Rejecting Senate PawSox Measure
Email to a friend
Permalink
Tuesday, January 23, 2018
GoLocalWorcester News Team
Speaker Mattiello spoke out on the PawSox on Monday.
Rhode Island House Speaker Nicholas Mattiello said Monday that any PawSox legislation must have the support of taxpayers -- and cited specifically the
GoLocal poll conducted by Harvard's John Della Volpe for not moving forward with the Senate version.
The announcement came after the PawSox dropped a mailer in Mattiello’s district and scheduled a public meeting for Tuesday night, which GoLocal reported as "a strategy fairly unheard of in Rhode Island politics."
Comments from Speaker's Office
Mattiello spokesperson Larry Berman stated the following on Monday:
“Speaker Mattiello heard from the members of his House Democratic Caucus and they do not want the House to pass the Senate bill as written. They want the House to consider legislation that would significantly reduce the risk to the state’s taxpayers. They also do not want a public referendum on this issue.
Speaker Mattiello strongly believes we can not go forward with a public financing plan with two-thirds of the state in opposition. According to the GoLocalProv poll, 67 percent of Rhode Islanders oppose this plan. Any plan must have the support of the state’s taxpayers.
He calls upon the PawSox to take a pause, and should they wish to remain in Rhode Island, they should start new conversations which consider the will of Rhode Island taxpayers. Should that occur, Speaker Mattiello is happy to engage in those talks.”
Latest for PawSox, Mattiello
As GoLocal reported on Saturday:
The “Cranston Community Night” event in political circles is seen as a slap to Mattiello. The event is scheduled for Tuesday night at The Grange in western Cranston — the site of Mattiello’s election night rally in 2016.
Mattiello won by less than 100 votes over Steve Frias — a Republican Party leader in Rhode Island and Boston-based energy and utility attorney.
Frias has gone door-to-door in opposite to the proposed $40 million in proposed public financing for the stadium.
Reached on Saturday, Mattiello told GoLocal, "I appreciate that the PawSox are coming into my district to listen to the people and address the concerns I am hearing from my constituents. I encourage the team to have meaningful communication with all Rhode Islanders and have meetings in different regions throughout the state."
Related Slideshow: New PawSox Deal—December, 2017
Prev
Next
Compliance with Public Corporation Debt Management Act: The legislation was amended to better conform to the requirements of the State’s Public Corporation Debt Management Act, or “Kushner Act.” The Budget Office’s fiscal note indicated that the bill as originally written did not meet these requirements. The statute requires that financing leases to which the state is a party must be authorized by the General Assembly through resolution. The resolution must include the maximum possible obligation of the state. The original language only listed the value of the principal to be borrowed and not the cost of issuance and total debt service. The amended language more clearly identifies the maximums as $41.0 million, $26.0 million, and $18.0 million for the Series A, B, and C bonds respectively.
Prev
Next
Naming Rights: Based on the fact that the Pawtucket’s redevelopment agency will be the owner of the new ballpark and the determination that Pawtucket will experience a gap between new revenue and its annual debt obligation until sufficient ancillary development has taken place, S-0989 was amended to direct 50 percent of the ballpark naming rights revenue to the City of Pawtucket to assist with its annual debt service payment. This revenue is estimated to be $250,000.
Prev
Next
Ticket Pricing: Based on the determination that Pawtucket will experience a gap between new revenue and its annual debt obligation until sufficient ancillary development has taken place, S-0989 was amended to reflect the transfer of the premium ticket surcharge revenue from the state to the city. The bill clarifies the definition of a “ticket” and was amended to include language memorializing the team’s commitment not to raise ticket prices for five years.
Prev
Next
50K sq. ft. Ancillary Development: The legislation requires any future lease to include a provision that the team develop a minimum of 50,000 sq. ft. of real estate contemporaneously with the construction of the ballpark.
Prev
Next
Maintenance and Capital Improvement: S-0989 was amended so that any future lease must contain a requirement that the team is responsible for the daily, operational maintenance of the ballpark and its costs. The lease must also explicitly make clear that the state is not responsible for operational maintenance. The lease shall require that the team be responsible for a minimum 50 percent of annual capital expenditures and that the city, state, and team must contribute a minimum of $150,000 in total per year into a capital expenditure fund to finance capital expenditures. The parties will be required to develop a multi-year capital improvement plan detailing expected, future capital projects and outlays. No capital expenditure funds shall be used for operational maintenance.
Prev
Next
Construction Costs: The $12.0 million of equity pledged by team owners is required by the legislation to be the first funds expended towards the construction costs of the new ballpark. In the event that land acquisition and ballpark construction costs come in less than $83.0 million, the savings shall be distributed on a pro-rata basis to the team, city, and state at a rate of 46.5 percent, 32.4 percent, and 21.1 percent respectively. Lastly, any construction cost overruns that exist will be paid by the team.
Prev
Next
Public Park: The bill memorializes the commitment by the parties of making the new ballpark available as a public park facility. The bill requires the lease to contain a provision directing the city to provide planning and operational assistance on public park aspects of the park. The lease must also specify that the facility will be operated year-round in and around the ballpark, separate and apart from the ballpark’s baseball-related uses, in order to create public recreational, social, and communal benefits.
Prev
Next
Green Design & RIIB Financing: S-0989 was amended to encourage the use of energy efficient and sustainable design, construction, and operations at the new ballpark. It encourages the use of financing programs available through the Rhode Island Infrastructure Bank, including, to the extent practicable, the State Revolving Funds and the Efficient Buildings Fund, which provide low cost financing for eligible renewable and energy efficiency, stormwater abatement, water conservation, and other sustainable infrastructure projects.
Prev
Next
Fair Labor Standards Act Compliance: The legislation was amended to affirm the requirement that the team comply with fair labor standards. Employers associated with the business of the ballpark, including the team, would be required to adhere to state and federal Fair Labor Standards practices, including provisions that prevent labor misclassification by incorrectly designating workers as “independent contractors.”
Prev
Next
Lease Conditions: The lease is required to be for 30 years and must be reviewed and approved by the State Properties Commission prior to the issuance of bonds.
Prev
Next
Eminent Domain: Based on the concerns expressed during public testimony and a subsequent determination that the need for this expansion was overstated, S-0990 was amended to eliminate the expansion of eminent domain powers under the Redevelopment Act and to restore the definition of “blighted and substandard” throughout the bill.
Related Articles
- 12 Reasons Why the PawSox Move to Providence is in Peril
- What’s Next for the PawSox?
- Will City Subsidize Public Funds to Let Billionaires Bring PawSox to Worcester?
- PawSox Owners Drop Public Relations Team Following Failed Providence Bid
- Who Will Land the PawSox - Could Worcester, Springfield, or Fall River?
- Will Worcester Look Bad if New Bedford Ends Up with PawSox?
- 10 Things That Need to Happen to Get PawSox to Worcester
- PawSox Search For National Anthem Singer In Central Mass
- The PawSox Do The Harlem Shake
- City Councilors Make Pitch for PawSox to Come to Worcester
- VIDEO - What the PawSox Stadium Would Look Like in Worcester
- Not So Fast Worcester, Lucchino Says PawSox Are Slowing Down The Relocation Process
- Robert Whitcomb: Worcester Wouldn’t Well for PawSox; Taxing Away the Little Guys? Racial Fire
- Whitcomb Says Chances of PawSox Going to Worcester are Slim
- Democrats, Labor Stack Hearing for PawSox Funding Scheme at RI State House
- Facing Overwhelming Public Opposition for PawSox Deal in RI, What is Next for Owners
- PawSox Deal Looks Dead for 2017, RI Speaker Mattiello Raises Concerns
- Robert Whitcomb: Christmas for RI’s Public Unions; Worcester Pitching the PawSox; Thayer St. Churn
- 2 Worlds: All White PawSox Owners & Staff, Asking Pawtucket - 40% Minority & Poor - for Millions
- Has the PawSox Brand Been Damaged This Year?
- Rice, Boggs & Mondor to be Inducted Into PawSox Hall of Fame
- Hey RI, We Want the PawSox in Worcester, Guest MINDSETTER™ Quist
- Robert Whitcomb: PawSox Play, Watergate Summer De Luxe
- New PawSox Deal in RI: Cost of Borrowing Increases to $85M — 16% Increase
Enjoy this post? Share it with others.
Email to a friend
Permalink
Follow us on Pinterest Google + Facebook Twitter See It Read It