| | Advanced Search

 

Monfredo: Former Worcester Public School Member Publishes Book—A professional manual for students and professionals

QCC 50th, Celebrating Students: Ato Howard—A Biomedical Engineering student on the rise

MA Beauty Insider: Pedi Nation – Get the Best Pedicure Ever—A guide to finding a pristine pedi place

Fit for Life: Fail to Plan? Plan to Fail—Plan and prioritize, and you will prevail

Tom Finneran: Running on Envy—America's doctors run the gauntlet of envy

Arthur Schaper: Justina: Still Not Free—The crusade continues

Central MA Up + Comer: Vision Advertising CEO Laura Briere—Meet Central MA's rising stars...

FlyORH: Vote for Worcester in JetBlue Contest—Supporting ORH and JetBlue....

Catch the Moscow Festival Ballet With Your WOO Card—Where will you be WOOing this weekend?

Acclaimed Author Leah Hager Cohen to Give Reading at Holy Cross—Will read from new novel 'No Book but…

 
 

NEW: City Solicitor Says Rushford Not the Authority on Elections

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

 

When it comes to authority over elections in Worcester, the Election Commission has the final say.

City Solicitor David Moore laid out the pecking order in a memo to the City Manager and Council in response to requests for clarification made in the wake of this month's state primary elections.

"The first provision grants the election commission every power concerning elections granted by state law in local elections excepting only the power to set the days and hours of municipal elections," Moore wrote.

The City Manager is next in line with general superintendence duties over the commission, which include the appointment of members and the preparation and recommendation of the Commission's annual budgets.

According to Moore, in a city with an election commission, the City Clerk has no authority over the administration of elections.

Worcester is unique, however, in that the state passed home rule legislation in 2007, stating that the City Clerk "shall provide administrative and operational support to the board of election commissioners," which allows the clerk to perform the actions previously allotted to the "executive director" of the Election Commission.

Several city residents had previously questioned whether City Clerk David Rushford overstepped his bounds by removing individuals from polling locations for failing to abide by city and state polling location regulations.

The only authority in the election process afforded to the City Council is the ability to set the date and hours of municipal elections.

Moore's memo also clarified the laws surrounding election challengers and observers. Observers may enter the polling place and can be assigned a place within the polling location by the warden.

"Observers may not request the names and addresses directly from voters or interfere with the check in process in any way," Moore wrote.

"Observers may only communicate with the warden and not other poll workers or voters."

When it comes to enforcing such polling place rules, the duty falls to the warden who is authorized to have the police officer assigned to the polling location take disruptive individuals into custody and detain them until after the election is over.

"This report clarifies questions that have been lingering for years," said Councilor Konnie Lukes.

Councilors William Eddy and Joseph O'Brien expressed their collective wish to do more to get the 38 to 40 percent of inactive registered voters in Worcester properly registered ahead of time. 

 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

Comments:

Sandy Williamson

If the city had properly updated the voter lists annually, the number of "Inactive" registered voters would be much lower. I can't give a reference, but I'm of the understanding that proper, and legally required, updating of the registered voter list was skipped for about four years because it was "too expensive". Perhaps the someone in City Hall, or the City Council, could shed some light on this. The high number of "Inactives" puts a great deal of pressure on the poll workers to assist voters with paperwork, at the polling place, before they can vote.

Stephen Quist

A misleading story!
HEADLINE: City Solicitor Says Rushford Not the Authority on Elections

now for the truth while somewhat referred to in the article the headline misleads readers to believe something entirely different than what the actual facts are.

"Worcester is unique, however, in that the state passed a home rule legislation in 2007, stating that the City Clerk "shall provide administrative and operational support to the board of election commissioners," which allows the clerk to perform the actions previously allotted to the "executive director" of the Election Commission.

Thereby, the Honorable City Clerk, David Rushford has rightfully and lawfully exercised his powers as granted by the State Legislature according to law.




Commenting is not available in this channel entry.