| | Advanced Search

 

Massachusetts’ Best Communities 2013: #50-#26—Counting down the state's top 50 cities and…

Massachusetts’ Best Communities 2013: #100-#51—The countdown begins today...

NEW: Michael O. Moore: Time For Real Reform, Not Rhetoric—Senator pens an op-ed...

Rob Horowitz: The Ultimate City: Bohemians, Gays & Jobs—Location, location, location...

Freight Farms: Hot Boston Start-Up Expands To Worcester—Futuristic farming...

Niki Luparelli Brings Comedy and Cabaret To Worcester—Bowie, Monroe, Bond and more

Nashoba’s DI Baseball State Championship Run Falls Short—run falls short...

Barton Center for Diabetes Education Receives $300,000 Gift—Brooks H. Carpenter Leaves Legacy to Honor His…

CITY/STATE: What Makes A Great Community?—What do the numbers tell us, and what…

Methodology: Massachusetts’ Best Communities 2013—How we get the numbers...

 
 

NEW: Patrick Files Bill To Reform Juvenile Justice System

Monday, January 28, 2013

 

Governor Deval Patrick filed legislation on Monday that will reform the state's juvenile justice system by expanding the juvenile court's jurisdiction to 18 years old from 17 years old and removing mandatory life sentences without parole for juniles with first degree murder convictions.

“Every violent felon should be held accountable for their actions, even youth. But in sentencing every felon's circumstances should be considered, too, and youth itself is a special circumstance,” said Patrick. “It is time for the Commonwealth's laws to reflect the value, in accord with the Supreme Court, that young people deserve every opportunity for rehabilitation and reform.”

The legislation, “An Act to Reform the Juvenile Justice System in the Commonwealth,” follows the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Miller v. Alabama, which found that mandatory life sentences without the possibility of parole were unconstitutional for defendants under the age of 18 when they when they committed their crimes.

“Governor Patrick has proposed this legislation to create an improved justice system for our youth and for our Commonwealth,” said Massachusetts Child Advocate Gail Garinger.

“As every parent knows, teenagers are different from adults – they can act in the moment, be impulsive, and be unduly influenced by their peers and by adults. After the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. Alabama, Massachusetts judges must take these differences into account in sentencing, even when the adolescent has committed the worst of acts – the taking of another’s life. It is wrong to give up on any young person without considering the circumstances of his crime, his life experiences, and without asking whether he is capable of being rehabilitated before we sentence him to spend the rest of his life in prison without the possibility of parole.”

 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.




Commenting is not available in this channel entry.