| | Advanced Search

 

Paul Giorgio: Mr. Baker, MA Doesn’t Want a Liar for Governor—MA voters deserve a governor that will tell…

Central MA College Standout: Clark University’s Timothy Conley—Political Science major and track star

Organize + Energize: 4 Ways Getting Organized Will Save You Money—Stop wasting time and money

Patriots’ Day Patriots Primer—In Foxboro, the New England Patriots will begin…

Monfredo: Former Worcester Public School Member Publishes Book—A professional manual for students and professionals

QCC 50th, Celebrating Students: Ato Howard—A Biomedical Engineering student on the rise

MA Beauty Insider: Pedi Nation – Get the Best Pedicure Ever—A guide to finding a pristine pedi place

Fit for Life: Fail to Plan? Plan to Fail—Plan and prioritize, and you will prevail

7 Family Fun Activities for April Vacation—Keep you and the kids sane and entertained

Tom Finneran: Running on Envy—America's doctors run the gauntlet of envy

 
 

NEW: Plainville Slots Wins + West Springfield Casino Loses

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

 

Plaintville voters approved a slots parlor agreement, while West Springfield voters rejected a resort casino pact.

Tuesday was yet another day of stark contrast for two gaming developers eyeing Massachusetts locations. Plainville voters approved by more than a 3-to-1 margin a host-site agreement with Penn National Gaming for a slots parlor. On the other side of the state, in West Springfield, voters rejected by a much tighter margin a pact with Hard Rock Hotel and Casino for a resort casino.

The Plainville referendum vote was 1,582 for the Penn National agreement and 502 against it, with a registered-voter turnout of about 37 percent. In West Springfield, the tally was 4,165 for the Hard Rock deal and 3,413 against it, with a 46-percent turnout.

Hard Rock’s is the first resort-casino project to be beaten at the polls under the state’s three-year-old  Expanded Gaming Act. Two other proposals for the one available Western Mass. resort-casino license remain alive: MGM Grand’s for downtown Springfield; and Mohegan Sun’s for Palmer.

Three other proposals are still alive in Mass. for a total of three regional resort casinos, which, unlike slots parlors, contain other games such as blackjack and roulette. Two are for Eastern Mass., in Boston and Everett; and one is for Central Mass., Milford. Two other developers – one, in Leominster and the other, in Raynham – are vying to secure the Bay State’s sole slots-parlor license.

Penn National’s Bay State bets

On September 5, the Mass. Gaming Commission approved letting the Town of Plainville proceed with the September 10 referendum vote on Penn National’s proposal. The $2.9-billion, publicly traded firm wants to develop a slots parlor on the site of the struggling, 14-year-old Plainridge Park.

On September 3, Penn National signed an option to buy the 89-acre harness-racing complex from Ourway Realty for an undisclosed amount. The property transfer would occur if Penn National secures a slots license. Last month, the Gaming Commission disqualified an Ourway Realty slots proposal because of concern with business dealings by a former Ourway Realty executive.

When Ourway Realty was the slots developer, the Plainville referendum vote was scheduled for September 10. Penn National asked the town’s Board of Selectmen to honor the terms of the host agreement with Ourway Realty and proceed with the vote on that date.

Originally, Penn National was one of two big players seeking to develop a resort casino in Springfield. But Penn National lost out when that city’s officials backed MGM Grand’s resort-casino plan. Next, Penn National pitched a slots parlor for Tewskbury. However, the town’s voters rejected a required zoning change.

 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.




Write your comment...

You must be logged in to post comments.