| | Advanced Search

 

Worcester Stands to Lose $100K More on May Street Property—Worcester Stands to Lose $100K More on May…

Worcester Named Top City In US For College Grads—Latest ranking a top honor...

In Case You Missed It: Tim Murray Returns To Worcester—The week's top stories...

John Monfredo: Making Worcester “The City That Reads”—The many hands behind a book drive...

Matt Espeut’s Fit For Life: Fit at Forty—It's better than you think...

Former Milford High Star Colabello Makes Major League Debut—Local athlete makes it...

Clark Students Present Policy Ideas to Conservation Society—Students studied habitats of African elephants and Guanaco

MA Police Departments - Now Leveraging Social Media—MA Police Departments -- Now Leveraging Social Media

Worcester’s Family Businesses: Mill Street Motors—A truly unique business model that is still…

Common Wealth: Who’s Hot and Who’s Not in Mass Politics?—Common Wealth: Who's Hot and Who's Not in…

 
 

NEW: Worcester Council Open to Casino Proposals

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

 

Members of the Worcester City Council said they would be open to hearing proposals for a casino in the Commonwealth's second-largest city, but no such formal proposals have been submitted despite renewed chatter about interested developers.

A Measured Response

News of Cambridge-based developer Richard Friedman's interest in building a hotel and slots parlor in the heart of Worcester met with a staid response at Tuesday night's City Council meeting.

"I don't want people swooping in and trying to ruin our vision for Worcester," said City Councilor Frederick Rushton.

Rushton said there is a need for more hotel space in Worcester, but introducing a big box slots operation to the Kelly Square area did not seem to be in line with the vision of economic development the City has been developing over the past 15 years. The Councilor implored City Manager Michael O'Brien to be steadfast in preserving that vision in the course of discussions surrounding any gaming proposals that may be forthcoming.

"We're not looking for a two-star gaming operation in town," said Rushton. "They can go to Reno."

Councilor Joseph O'Brien said he and his fellow councilors should not immediately rule out a gaming parlor in the City but should instead consider any proposals on an individual basis.

"Gaming is coming. It's going to happen in this state," O'Brien said.

District 5 Councilor William Eddy echoed Rushton's desire not to settle for less than a first-class facility in Worcester, adding that the Council has a responsibility to the city's residents to hear and discuss any proposals.

"We're always open to having discussions with developers with strong track records," he said, adding that the Council should be careful about the message it sent to the public in its own discussion of the topic on Tuesday night.

Support Will Hinge on Specifics

That message did not include any unequivocal support for a gaming parlor in Worcester. Councilor Kathleen Toomey said she was willing to listen to proposals, but she would have to hear detailed plans before deciding whether or not to support such a venture. District 1 Councilor Anthony Economou and District 3 Councilor George Russell also said they were open to hearing specific proposals before taking a stance on the issue. Mayor Joseph Petty said he would be open-minded in considering a solid proposal that fits well with the City's economic development plans if such a proposal is received.

"I think casinos are an admission of failure," said Councilor Konstantina Lukes.

Lukes said choosing to locate a casino in a city seems to indicate that there are limited job opportunities in the area and is more of a final option for spurring economic development. For her part, Lukes said she would like to see Worcester's high tech industries flourish rather than a slots parlor in the center of the City.

No Formal Proposals Yet

City Manager O'Brien said several interested parties have approached the City about a possible gaming parlor since the Commonwealth's legislature passed its casino bill last fall. However, none of those parties have come forward with definitive plans.

"We've had cursory conversations at best," O'Brien said.

With a January 15th deadline for proposals and deposits, time is running short, and any interested developer would have to generate a substantive proposal very quickly. While the City's conversations with prospective developers have so far been intermittent and lacking in details, a more productive discussion could be possible once a formal proposal is received.

"In the meantime, it's just fantasy," said O'Brien. 

 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.




Commenting is not available in this channel entry.