New Worcester Teacher Evaluations Turn Focus on Student Progress
Friday, February 28, 2014
In the Worcester Public School system, the district's local teachers union requested negotiations Thursday around those measures, known as DDMs in the state's nomenclature.
“We realize in Worcester that we need to get the new evaluation system done properly and done correctly,” said Leonard Zalauskas, president of the Educational Association of Worcester. With rollout of the state's educator evaluation framework stretching through to the 2015-16 school year, Zalauskas stressed the importance of due diligence. “It's so new, and we have so many people across the state: Some people are getting it right, and some people aren't.”
“It's going to take some time to shake out the bugs,” he said.
In the midst of implementation
Approximately two-thirds of districts across the state evaluated educators under the new framework in the 2012-13 school year (all those competing in the federal Race To The Top competition); this year all districts are expected to follow their lead. But schools are only piloting DDMs in certain subject areas this year.
The DDMs are meant to measure student growth through the school year, determining an educator's “impact on student learning.” The measures must consider several years' of data and include both standardized assessments and a second measure, involving work portfolios or a local assessment.
Next year, in 2014-15, the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education expects districts to have full evaluation systems in place, leading to “student impact ratings” of educators the following year.
“There will be a learning curve taking place as one goes through the first two years of the new evaluation system,” according to school committee vice-chair John Monfredo, a GoLocal MINDSETTER. “In addition, more training will be given to administrators about the process this year and they will have an opportunity to review data from the state.”
'Learning curve' to eval system
The push toward more regulated, robust evaluation systems is driven across the nation in most states by law and federal incentives like RTTT. Local districts previously had greater leeway in monitoring teacher effectiveness, often focusing around in-classroom observations, leading to criticisms that evaluations varied dramatically in scope and effectiveness.
Massachusetts' new evaluation model revolves around a five-step cycle each year, and will ultimately provide each educator with two separate ratings: A summative performance rating (educator practice) and an impact rating on student performance (measuring achievement), the latter of which will begin to be assigned in 2015-16.
In the first round of summative evaluations from last year, 92.6 percent of evaluated educators were “exemplary” or “proficient” statewide — 93.9 percent were in WPS.
“Teachers are being monitored closely and know what their goals are for the year and what they need to do to reach them,” Monfredo said.
“I believe that teachers know they are accountable and review the data on their students very closely. The majority of teachers are working very hard to meet the needs of their students,” he added.
Last year, the nonprofit research group SRI International was employed by state education officials survey educators and principals during the first year of the independent evaluations.
While limited in scope and not a representative survey size, those researchers found the majority of educators expressed “generally positive views” of the new system, reporting that it had significant advantages over past evaluation practices.
Both groups surveyed said they wanted more training and guidance on goal-setting and evidence collection. Concerns among educators focused on fairness, with respect to inadequate time for thorough evaluation and inconsistent expectations between evaluators (typically building principals and administrators).
A majority of educators found the new evaluation system created a “significant increase in workload and time for evaluators,” SRI found, with 55 percent of principals reporting they spent more than a quarter of their time on evaluation activities.
But administrators generally held the most positive views, while teachers of non-core subjects and non-instructional staff were more hesitant.
Not just teachers being evaluated
Principals and administrators are also being evaluated, albeit along different lines. Earlier this month, school committee members rated Superintendent Melinda Boone as “proficient” overall in the past year based on specific goals and standards.
Related Slideshow: Central MA School Districts with the Highest Teacher Evaluations
During the 2012-2013 school year, Race to the Top (RTTT) districts in Massachusetts were required to implement the new Educator Evaluation framework with at least 50 percent of their educators district-wide. Of Central Massachusetts’s 52 school districts, 26 implemented the Educator Evaluation structure. These 26 school districts are listed below ranked from the lowest teacher evaluation score to the highest. Keep reading to see where your district’s teachers rank, as well as to view the state and regional averages.
Related Articles
- 1 in 10 Worcester Teachers Missed at Least 20 Days Last Year
- John Monfredo: Arts Are Alive and Well in Worcester Public Schools
- NEW: Worcester Public Schools Score $45K in Gateway Cities Education Grants
- Central MA School Districts With The Highest Teacher Ratings
- Julia Steiny: ‘Grand Rounds’ Support Teacher Learning and Quality
- The Highest Paid Teachers in Central Mass.
- Aaron Regunberg: Corporate ‘Reform’ Alienating Teachers/Principals
- John Monfredo: How Worcester Public Schools are Dealing With Concussions
- The Hidden Costs At Public Schools
- Clark Alumni Association Selects Arlington Teacher for OSEA
- NEW: Fitchburg Teacher’s Aide on Paid Leave Over Racy Photos
- Tom Finneran: Parent-Teacher Night
- Appreciation Week: Thanking Teachers and Nurses
- John Monfredo: Superintendent Boone and The State of Worcester Public Schools
- UPDATE: Worcester Public Schools Closed Tuesday
- Clark Prof. Co-Authors Book, Says ‘Coaching Makes Better Teachers’
- NEW:Teachers Union Protests Superintendent’s Decision at City Hall
- Wachusett Superintendent To Cut Teachers Over Custodians
- BREAKING: Marlborough Teachers Vote No Confidence in Superintendent
- John Monfredo: The Future of Worcester Public Schools
- 100 Worcester Teachers and Admin Earn More Than $100K
- Clark Scholar’s New Book Guides Teachers in Collaborative Learning
- National Ed Leader to Speak at Clark on Producing Effective Teachers
- BREAKING: Settlement Reached Between Superintendent and Teachers on Claremont Issue
- John Monfredo: Welcoming Families to Worcester Public Schools
- BREAKING: Claremont Teachers Protest: “Let Us Keep Our Jobs”
- EXCLUSIVE: Worcester Union Head Calls off Teacher Protest
- BREAKING: Worcester Teachers Union to Protest in Boston
- Julia Steiny: Public Schools Owe Neglected Kids More Than Academics
- Claremont Academy Teachers Protest School Overhaul
- Highest Paid Teachers in Central Mass
- See The 20 Central MA Districts With The Highest Paid Teachers
- Foley 5K to Support Worcester Public Schools
- Leading Central MA: Worcester Public Schools’ Robert Jennings
- Family Matters: Teacher Gifts & More
- In Case You Missed It: Highest Paid Teachers in Central MA
- See The Top Districts: Central MA Teachers Get Graded
- John Monfredo: Adult Learning A Worcester Public Schools Treasure
- NEW: Worcester Public Schools Closed Monday
- Tracy Novick:Teacher Evaluations- In for a penny, in for a pound
- John Monfredo: May is the Month To Remember Our Teachers + Nurses
- The Flaws In The Teacher Evaluation Ballot Initiative
Follow us on Pinterest Google + Facebook Twitter See It Read It