| | Advanced Search


Monfredo: Former Worcester Public School Member Publishes Book—A professional manual for students and professionals

QCC 50th, Celebrating Students: Ato Howard—A Biomedical Engineering student on the rise

MA Beauty Insider: Pedi Nation – Get the Best Pedicure Ever—A guide to finding a pristine pedi place

Fit for Life: Fail to Plan? Plan to Fail—Plan and prioritize, and you will prevail

Tom Finneran: Running on Envy—America's doctors run the gauntlet of envy

Arthur Schaper: Justina: Still Not Free—The crusade continues

Central MA Up + Comer: Vision Advertising CEO Laura Briere—Meet Central MA's rising stars...

FlyORH: Vote for Worcester in JetBlue Contest—Supporting ORH and JetBlue....

Catch the Moscow Festival Ballet With Your WOO Card—Where will you be WOOing this weekend?

Acclaimed Author Leah Hager Cohen to Give Reading at Holy Cross—Will read from new novel 'No Book but…


Report: Obamacare Will Cost MA Residents Over $3.8 Billion

Saturday, December 08, 2012


Bay State residents will see the second largest impact from the new health insurance tax, nearly $10,000 for the average family over the next 10 years, according to a new report from America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP).

The report, conducted by Oliver Wyman for AHIP, found that Massachusetts will see the 10th highest average aggregate impact over the 10-year period of 2014 to 2023 at between $3.85 and $3.89 billion.

The ACA imposes a new sales tax on health insurance that starts at $8 billion in 2014, increases to $14.3 billion in 2018, and will continue to increase each year. The Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that the health insurance tax will exceed $100 billion over the next ten years.

“With full implementation of the ACA a year away, the focus needs to be on making coverage more affordable,” said AHIP President and CEO Karen Ignagni. “Taxing health insurance will have the opposite effect by making it more expensive.”

Ignagni noted that the health insurance tax will increase costs for individuals and families purchasing coverage on their own, small businesses, Medicare Advantage beneficiaries, and Medicaid managed care programs. AHIP supports legislation (H.R. 1370, S.1880) that would repeal the tax.

In Massachusetts, that increase will translate into a 10-year average aggregate impact of $9,937 per family for health insurance covered purchased on the individual market, making the Commonwealth the second hardest hit state behind New York with a 10-year impact of $9,942. Families who receive health insurance coverage through small employers in the Bay State will be the 5th hardest hit, with a 10-year average aggregate impact of $7,895 per family.

"It all comes from the fact that we're historically a high premium state," said Joshua Archambault, director of Health Care Policy and Middle Cities at the Pioneer Institute of Public Policy Research.

"As a result, all of these revenue raisers in the federal healthcare law disproportiionaltely fall on the shoulders of Massachusetts." 

The new health insurance tax will not affect everyone, however. It will fall only on what are referred to as "fully-insured" individuals or families who purchase their health insurance on their own from providers. Small businesses that purchase their own health insurance will be affected as well. Archambault said that larger, self-insured companies, such as the colleges and universities in Worcester, will not be affected by the tax.

As part of the ongoing implementation of the ACA, a number of other federal taxes are in the pipeline, including the so-called "Cadillac tax."

"It's a tax that kicks in in 2018 and is a 40 percent tax on the amount that your premium is above a set threshold," said Archambault.

And while the thresholds are indexed for inflation and will increase with the passing of time, as a high premium state, Massachusetts subscribers will be disproportionately affected by the levy as well.

"The really, really big one is the medical device tax," Archambault said. "This will have a disproportionate impact on our economy because of how many of those companies are located in the state."

The financial impact of the medical device tax has been estimated at $29.1 billion nationally, and based off 2011 revenues of Massachusetts-based device manufacturers, the local impact would be roughly $376 million per year. 


Related Articles


Enjoy this post? Share it with others.


Paul Roy

Three billion in extra taxes. This is what happens when the government decides to take over something and run it. While it might be too late for us with Obamacare do we need any more reason to not allow this kind of thing to happen again?

The Roberts decision about Obamacare opens up the door for the government to do this again and again, we need to stop it. This is why we need a Mandate Amendment to the United States Constitution. It is wrong for the government to mandate we buy any goods or services it opens up the system to even more graft and corruption.

Iron Mike Farquhar

Democrats ~ thought ~ that by electing Obama, - then re-electing him, that the rich would be taxed to provide economic uplift for the poor.

Lofty dreams perhaps, but Obama has already shown how little he cares about the poor. He merely uses them as stones to throw at the rich.

Obama is about POWER. Power for HIM. Your word of the day is 'narcissists'.

Now watch more jobs go away, and the wait to see a doctor grow longer.

Imagine the folly – adding TAXES – to 'improve health care'? Yeah, right!

Dan Mullen

"according to a new report from America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP)"?

You mean the health insurance industry's main lobbying force? That has a clear interest in maintaining the status quo to keep their bottom lines as large as possible?

That tells you all you need to know about this "article".

Edward Saucier

Dan Mullen is correct. Just a little bit of checking out that outfit AHIP tells a lot. Let me intermingle a bit of copy & paste with my own "stuff."

America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) is a national political advocacy and trade association with about 1,300 member companies that sell health insurance coverage to more than 200 million Americans.

Oliver Wyman is just another hired gun accounting firm catapulting the propaganda for the industry. They fudge the numbers on government run healthcare and report that the proposed bills as currently envisioned, will bring consumers insurance premiums way up. THEY TRY TO SCARE YOU - BOO!

On the July 10 2009 edition of Bill Moyers Journal, Wendell Potter, former Vice President of corporate communications at the health insurance corporation CIGNA, claimed that the industry was "afraid" of the Michael Moore documentary Sicko. As a result, AHIP formed a strategy to discredit this film. The strategy could not list any factual errors in Sicko. So instead focused primarily on media messaging in terms of influencing politicians and public opinion.

AHIP's 2005 television ad "Shark Bait" drew harsh criticism for its claim that "lawsuit abuse" by American trial lawyers cost the typical American family $1,200 a year. Not true and Factcheck listed it as Half-True.

So it seems GoLocalWorcester is just another rightist group infiltrating Worcester in their Trojan Horse. I suppose they heard Worcester has a lot of dipsticks judging from the T&G's comment section and decided to drop a net here. After all you can fool most of the people all of the time, and those are the ones to concentrate on. George W. said that. One of the few things he said that made any sense. Are you scared now? Or are you willing to bet, like I am, that ObamaCare will NOT cost Mass. residents over $3.8 billion?

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.