Welcome! Login | Register
 

Worcester Police Officer and Local Boy Drown in Accident, and in Braintree 2 Police Shot, K-9 Killed—Worcester Police Officer and Local Boy Drown in…

Person of Interest Named in Molly Bish Case By Worcester County DA—Person of Interest Named in Molly Bish Case…

Bravehearts Escape Nashua With a Win, 9th Inning Controversy—Bravehearts Escape Nashua With a Win, 9th Inning…

Worcester Regional Research Bureau Announces Recipients of 2021 Awards—Worcester Regional Research Bureau Announces Recipients of 2021…

16 Year Old Shot, Worcester Police Detectives Investigating Shooting at Crompton Park—16 Year Old Shot, Worcester Police Detectives Investigating…

Feds Charge Former MA Pizzeria Owner With PPP Fraud - Allegedly Used Loan to Purchase Alpaca Farm—Feds Charge Former MA Pizzeria Owner With PPP…

Facebook’s independent Oversight Board on Wednesday announced it has ruled in favor of upholding the—Trump's Facebook Suspension Upheld

Patriots’ Kraft Buys Hamptons Beach House for $43 Million, According to Reports—Patriots’ Kraft Buys Hamptons Beach House for $43…

Clark Alum Donates $6M to Support Arts and Music Initiatives—Clark Alum Donates $6M to Support Arts and…

CVS & Walgreens Have Wasted Nearly 130,000 Vaccine Doses, According to Report—CVS & Walgreens Have Wasted Nearly 130,000 Vaccine…

 
 

Should City Employees Be Required to Live in Worcester?

Tuesday, March 10, 2015

 

In February, the City of Worcester released its list of the 250 top earners. Of the 100 highest paid City of Worcester employees, more than 20 of them reside outside of the city. The earnings for these employees are more than $3 million.

The 2014 gross earnings of these individuals range from just over $120,000 to nearly $160,000 a year.

GoLocal Worcester reached out to several prominent voices in the Worcester community and asked them, “Should city employees be required to live in Worcester?”

“This works two ways. While many of our city employees choose to live outside of Worcester, many more Worcester residents hold jobs outside of the city. Thankfully, they bring those paychecks back to Worcester. We wouldn't want all those other cities and towns to ban our residents from working there,” said Worcester City Councilor Gary Rosen.

SEE SLIDES BELOW: Local Leaders Chime In on City Employee Residency Requirements

According to the residency ordinance for officers and employees in Worcester, individuals who are part of certain pay schedules, "or is promoted to the position of deputy chief within the police or fire departments shall become a domiciled resident of the city within one year from the date of such promotion or appointment and shall remain a domiciled resident of the city during the terms of such employment or appointment."

Provisions of the residency ordinance also apply “to any individual who was an officer or employee of the city in any position or capacity on or before May 23, 1995; or...to employees specifically exempted by statute or collective bargaining agreements from such a residency requirement.

City Councilor George Russell said, “I don't believe we should require current City employees to move to Worcester but whenever possible preference should be given to Worcester residents when filling new or open positions in City Government.”

Many city employees are "grandfathered" in to the ordinance because they were hired before May 23, 1995. Other city employees that live outside of Worcester have been given waivers by past City Managers.

Worcester Police and Fire 

“We should be negotiating when contracts are up for renewal with our City employee unions to incentivize a higher percentage of our city employees to live in Worcester,” said City Councilor Morris Bergman.

Worcester police officers have to have a one year proof of residency in Worcester prior to taking the academy entrance exam. Once hired, police officers and firefighters can move 10 miles outside of the city. 

Officers that make lateral moves from another city's police department to Worcester PD are not required to have proof of Worcester residency. 

Worcester Teachers Can Live Outside of City

Massachusetts law exempts teachers in the state from having to live within the city they teach in. Multiple Worcester Public Schools administrators live outside of the city. At least nine Worcester principals live outside of Worcester.

Worcester School Committee Brian O’Connell said, “Massachusetts law prohibits us from requiring that certain categories of school district employees reside in Worcester as a condition of their employment. However, we may - and do - insist that several key employees, such as our Superintendent, live in Worcester."

Boston and Springfield Enforce City Residence Ordinances

The cities of Boston and Springfield each have their own residency requirements for city workers. Both cities have tried to enforce regulations on city residence ordinances over the past twenty years. In Springfield, any person employed on or after March 17, 1995, "shall be a resident of the City of Springfield and shall not cease to be a resident during his employment by the City."

In Boston, all applicants for city jobs have to be a resident of Boston by their first day of employment. As of 1994, new hires must file a certificate of residency with Boston on their day of hire and every year on February 1. Springfield also requires its employees to file a certificate of residence annually on February 1. 

According to the city of Boston, "Failure to file an annual residency certificate and sufficient documentation will result in a voluntary termination of your employment."

Local Reps Offer Alternatives, Promote Employment of Worcester Residents

Russell said, “The City should make every effort to offer jobs to Worcester residents. While state regulations prohibit a strict residency requirement for many City positions it is imperative that we continue the good work of (Worcester City Manager) Ed Augustus' outreach to make sure Worcester residents know of job opportunities and scheduling for Civil Service exams.

John Giangregorio, President of the Canal District Business Association said, "City employees are the new Worcester middle class. They are generously compensated and their economic activity could greatly help Worcester businesses. Over two hundred city employees make over $100,000 putting them in the top 10% of American earners. This money spent in our city would have a positive impact on our neighborhoods. Their home buying power can help stabilize housing prices and commitment to the city and help stabilize our neighborhoods. They could have a great impact on civic life and public engagement as their job experience gives them a unique perspective on city life and governance.

O’Connell said, "I would like us to implement a "preference" in the hiring process for Worcester residents, all else being equal as to training, ability and qualifications, for the positions as to which a preference is legally permissible."

 

Related Slideshow: Worcester Leaders Chime In on City Employee Residency Question

Prev Next

John Giangregorio

"City employees should live in the city. City employees should be able to experience the nuances of city life. The experience of the delivery of city services and general condition and costs of city infrastructure," said John Giangregorio, President of the Canal District Business Association.

Giangregrio continued, "City employees have institutional knowledge and a grasp of how the government could work more effectively for our neighborhoods."

Prev Next

City Councilor George Russell

"I don't believe we should require current City employees to move to Worcester but whenever possible preference should be given to Worcester residents when filling new or open positions in City Government," said Worcester City Councilor George Russell. "The City should make every effort to offer jobs to Worcester residents."

"While state regulations prohibit a strict residency requirement for many City positions it is imperative that we continue the good work of Ed Augustus's outreach to make sure Worcester residents know of job opportunities and scheduling for Civil Service exams."

Prev Next

John Monfredo, School Committee

“I would like to give Worcester residents preference, if all things being equal, in the hiring of jobs where legal and appropriate," said Worcester School Committee member and GoLocal Worcester Mindsetter.

Prev Next

City Councilor Gary Rosen

City Councilor Gary Rosen said, “I think that it's much more important for city employees to be skilled and talented. Let's always hire those whose work and work ethic will be most beneficial to our city. If the most qualified candidates live in our city, all the better.

"In any case, it's incumbent upon our elected and appointed officials to provide the leadership and decision-making skills to make Worcester such a healthy, safe and prosperous city that our employees won't want to leave it at the end of the workday.”

Prev Next

Tom Finneran

Former Massachusetts Speaker of the House and GoLocal Mindsetter Tom Finneran said, "I would say ‘No.’ Ability and talent are not peculiar to a specific address. And ability and talent are the pistons which drive an organization forward. They are not dependent on where one rests his head at night.”

Prev Next

Gary Vecchio

 “By state law, there are certain jobs where this can not be required. Teachers, police, and  firefighters are allowed to live outside of the city they work in. I do believe that department heads, and other key administrators earning six figure salaries should live in Worcester. People who are hired for such positions who do not live in Worcester, should be given up to a year to move here," said Shrewsbury Street Neighborhood Association President Gary Vecchio.

Prev Next

City Councilor Morris Bergman

“We should be negotiating when contracts are up for renewal with our City employee unions to incentivize a higher percentage of our city employees to live in Worcester,” said City Councilor Morris Bergman.

Prev Next

Paul Giorgio

Local Democratic voice, GoLocal Worcester Mindsetter, and President of Pagio, Inc., Paul Giorgio said "The problem with large cities in the past decade has been urban flight by the middle class. One way to stabilize  a city and its neighborhoods is to have city workers live in the city. One impediment to this is state law which allows municipal workers to live in  within a certain distance of the city that employees them. I think a carrot can be an  incentive program  such as low mortgage rates and subsidies. The stick is  language that forces new hires to be required to live in the city.”

Prev Next

Brian O'Connell, School Committe

Worcester School Committee member Brian O'Connell said, "Massachusetts law prohibits us from requiring that certain categories of school district employees reside in Worcester as a condition of their employment. However, we may - and do - insist that several key employees, such as our Superintendent, live in Worcester. I would like us to implement a "preference" in the hiring process for Worcester residents, all else being equal as to training, ability and qualifications, for the positions as to which a preference is legally permissible."

 
 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

 
Delivered Free Every
Day to Your Inbox