Welcome! Login | Register
 

Dunkin’ Donuts Tops List for ‘Most Significant’ Chain Restaurant in Massachusetts—Dunkin' Donuts was named the "most significant restaurant…

Dale LePage and the Manhattans CD Release Party September 4—Ceres Bistro at the Beechwood Hotel will host…

Gronkowski “Good to Go” Week 1—Rob Gronkowski told reporters at Gillette Stadium that…

Guest MINDSETTER™ Warren Tolman: Candidate for Attorney General—This race for Attorney General is about leadership.…

Smart Benefits: Two Regs Issued on Contraceptive Coverage—Two regulations on contraceptive coverage were recently issued…

College Admissions: 8 Things They Won’t Tell You in Freshman Orientation—As families pack suitcases and head off to…

Junior League of Worcester Kicked Off 90th Year With a Move—The Junior League of Worcester (JLW) and its…

Fall Activities for the Whole Family—Mark your calendars for the best activities of…

The Urban Gardener: Harvesting Green Beans + Sunflowers—Gardening made simple...

Worcester Pride to Host First Annual Youth Dance—Worcester Pride will host its first annual youth…

 
 

Worcester Elections Debacle: Top Stories in Central Mass in 2012

Monday, December 31, 2012

 

The biggest news out of the ballot box in Worcester this year wasn't who won or lost, but how the elections themselves were conducted.

September's state primary was plagued by allegations of voter suppression and intimidation that centered around poll observers, and the City's Board of Election Commissioners, after hearing from poll workers and Council members, moved to institute new rules for poll observers that would require them to provide ID and wear a badge identifying themselves but passed on pursuing a formal investigation.

However, after training poll workers under the new guidelines, word came down from the Secretary of State's Elections Division that those new protocols had never been approved by their office, contrary to statements made by City Clerk David Rushford. The Election Commission held a last minute meeting prior to the November general election to make sure the City was in line with state laws, and, other than long lines, Election Day went off without a hitch.

It's still not clear how the mix-up occurred, but Rushford maintained that there was never any intention to withhold information on his part.

 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

 

You Must be Logged In to Comment