Welcome! Login | Register
 

Do You Get “Do-Overs” in Politics?—Sunday Political Brunch - July 22, 2018—Do You Get “Do-Overs” in Politics? -- Sunday…

10 Great Things to do in Worcester This Weekend - July 20, 2018—10 Great Things to do in Worcester This…

Revolution Fall to Red Bulls 2-0—Revolution Fall to Red Bulls 2-0

Three Arrested for Dealing Heroin & Cocaine Inside Worcester Apartment—Three Arrested for Dealing Heroin & Cocaine Inside…

Monfredo: Superintendent Binienda Releases Her Mid-Cycle Report—Monfredo: Superintendent Binienda Releases Her Mid-Cycle Report

Fit For Life: Sometimes It’s Important NOT to do Something—Fit For Life: Sometimes It's Important NOT to…

Over 20 Worcester Public Library Volunteers Honored During Luncheon—Over 20 Worcester Public Library Volunteers Honored During…

Finneran: Blame the Wright Brothers—Finneran: Blame the Wright Brothers

MA House & Senate Pass Bill Increasing Age of Sale for Tobacco Products to 21—MA House & Senate Pass Bill Increasing Age…

Celtics Re-Sign Smart to 4-Year, $52 Million Deal—Celtics Re-Sign Smart to 4-Year, $52 Million Deal

 
 

Worcester Elections Debacle: Top Stories in Central Mass in 2012

Monday, December 31, 2012

 

The biggest news out of the ballot box in Worcester this year wasn't who won or lost, but how the elections themselves were conducted.

September's state primary was plagued by allegations of voter suppression and intimidation that centered around poll observers, and the City's Board of Election Commissioners, after hearing from poll workers and Council members, moved to institute new rules for poll observers that would require them to provide ID and wear a badge identifying themselves but passed on pursuing a formal investigation.

However, after training poll workers under the new guidelines, word came down from the Secretary of State's Elections Division that those new protocols had never been approved by their office, contrary to statements made by City Clerk David Rushford. The Election Commission held a last minute meeting prior to the November general election to make sure the City was in line with state laws, and, other than long lines, Election Day went off without a hitch.

It's still not clear how the mix-up occurred, but Rushford maintained that there was never any intention to withhold information on his part.

 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

 

X

Stay Connected — Free
Daily Email