Welcome! Login | Register
 

Worcester Police Officer and Local Boy Drown in Accident, and in Braintree 2 Police Shot, K-9 Killed—Worcester Police Officer and Local Boy Drown in…

Person of Interest Named in Molly Bish Case By Worcester County DA—Person of Interest Named in Molly Bish Case…

Bravehearts Escape Nashua With a Win, 9th Inning Controversy—Bravehearts Escape Nashua With a Win, 9th Inning…

Worcester Regional Research Bureau Announces Recipients of 2021 Awards—Worcester Regional Research Bureau Announces Recipients of 2021…

16 Year Old Shot, Worcester Police Detectives Investigating Shooting at Crompton Park—16 Year Old Shot, Worcester Police Detectives Investigating…

Feds Charge Former MA Pizzeria Owner With PPP Fraud - Allegedly Used Loan to Purchase Alpaca Farm—Feds Charge Former MA Pizzeria Owner With PPP…

Facebook’s independent Oversight Board on Wednesday announced it has ruled in favor of upholding the—Trump's Facebook Suspension Upheld

Patriots’ Kraft Buys Hamptons Beach House for $43 Million, According to Reports—Patriots’ Kraft Buys Hamptons Beach House for $43…

Clark Alum Donates $6M to Support Arts and Music Initiatives—Clark Alum Donates $6M to Support Arts and…

CVS & Walgreens Have Wasted Nearly 130,000 Vaccine Doses, According to Report—CVS & Walgreens Have Wasted Nearly 130,000 Vaccine…

 
 

Worcester Public Schools Lose $22 Million Annually to Charter Schools

Friday, June 19, 2015

 

School districts in Central Massachusetts are losing millions in much-needed funds in inflated tuition payments to charter schools, according to a GoLocalWorcester analysis of data from the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE).

A review of the FY2016 cost and aid projections for charter schools and the school districts they reside in shows that Worcester will pay more than $22 million in local charter school tuition payments over the course of the next fiscal year.

“I believe that public education is to provide the best education as possible in the schools and encourage parents to have the Worcester Public Schools as their school of choice. Charter schools receive public money based on the number of students they enroll and  it is a drain on public education, without a doubt,” said School Committee member and GoLocalWorcester MINDSETTER™ John Monfredo. “They use public funds without public oversight (elected school committee) and because of state control, local communities are denied the ability to reject them.”

SEE SLIDES BELOW: Central MA School Districts That Lose the Most Money to Charter Schools

"In addition, fewer low-income students, fewer students with special needs, fewer English Language Learners and students with severe disabilities attend charter schools," Monfredo added. "Also, many charter schools have high attrition rates and thus underperforming students are sent back to the public schools."

As part of Massachusetts legislation - Chapter 46 and Increased Tuition Aid - districts receive aid when charter school tuition increases and for first year students that enter a charter school from a private school or from being home-schooled.

In FY2016, Worcester will receive roughly $2.6 million in aid to help offset the $22 million in costs.

“Charter schools hinder public school budgets because a whole new set of administration, teachers, supplies, and more is needed,” Brian Allen, Chief Financial & Operations Officer of the Worcester Public School District told GoLocalWorcester. “Having stand-alone school districts are taking away funding from the public schools around them. I don’t believe that this is the most effective way to have tax dollars spent.”

How Does This All Work and At What Cost?

“The idea of a charter school back in the 1990’s was that they were going to be innovative, be a model for the public schools and run by teachers. It didn’t happen. If you look at the Worcester Public Schools we have eight innovative schools that have great autonomy over curriculum and have been most successful,” said Monfredo.

Massachusetts law requires that the public school district pay for a student that chooses to attend a charter school rather than a public school.

“The reimbursement system pays the public school district for a total of six years,” Dominic Slowey, a spokesperson for the Massachusetts Charter Public School Association told GoLocalWorcester. “That is six years that a district is being paid by the state where they are not required to educate the student.”

Tuition is based on the average funding per student of a school district. Charter schools use the money to pay for teachers, equipment, books, etc. From the state, charter schools receive funding in the form of facilities aid since these schools are not eligible for funding from the School Building Administration.

Across the state, a projected $422 million will be spent by school districts to keep charter schools up and running in FY2016. The state in turn will reimburse the districts $76 million in aid.

Since FY2007, the payment of the school districts in the Commonwealth has risen from $206 million to $422 million. The average annual charter school tuition has gone up from $10,486 to more than $13,000 over that same period.

Funding for Charter School Facilities in Massachusetts - Graph Courtesy of Massbudget.org.

These rising costs to public school district don’t seem to be slowing down and may get much more expensive in the future.

According to pre-enrollment data from the DESE for the 2015-2016 school year, nearly 3,400 students in Massachusetts students will be entering Pre-K or Kindergarten at charter schools this September.

In Worcester, pre-enrollment in those grades is just over 200 students - adding to the nearly 2,000 students in the city that already attend charter schools.

Sides Taken on Charter Schools and Funding

Abby Kelley Foster Charter School

Governor Charlie Baker, an advocate for more charter schools in Massachusetts, said in his inaugural address “While traditional public schools will always be the backbone of our education, we need more high performing public charter schools in underperforming school districts to complement them. As I speak, there are more than 45,000 Bay State kids and their parents on waiting lists for these schools.”

The state currently has a cap on how many charter schools can be open and has a very thorough and strict process of approval for those trying to open a charter school.

“It’s wrong for any of us to stand on a front porch or in a city neighborhood sympathizing with a mom or dad when they tell us their child is not getting the education to succeed in life and then oppose lifting the charter school cap or making the changes we need to ensure that every school is great,” added Baker.

“Parents should be able to choose where their child and where their tax dollars are going,” said Slowey. “The tension between charter schools and public schools almost always comes down to money. Because of the formula and the way the system works, Worcester hasn’t been gaining or losing money because the amount of students leaving has remained relatively unchanged.”

Monfredo believes that charter schools are doing more harm than good to the city’s public schools. Monfredo said, “Charter schools typically pay their teachers less for longer hours and have a high teacher turnover. Charters, as they exist, have added to the eroding of public schools and an investment opportunity for those who see education as a business rather than an institution of democratic civic life and learning.  We need to put the brakes on charter expansion and work on providing excellent public schools for all of our students and be given  the necessary resources.  We need to have our elected officials  fix the funding mechanism that fund our public schools.”

 

Related Slideshow: Central MA School Districts with Most Money Lost to Charter Schools

Prev Next

29.

School District: Sutton

Cost to District: $11,600

Charter Aid to District: $9,407

Net Cost to District: $2,193

Prev Next

28.

School District: Blackstone/Millvile

Cost to District: $10,041

Charter Aid to District: $893

Net Cost to District: $9,148

Prev Next

27.

School District: Uxbridge

Cost to District: $13,909

Charter Aid to District: $3,120

Net Cost to District: $10,789

Prev Next

26.

School District: Athol/Royalston

Cost to District: $20,208

Charter Aid to District: $1,786

Net Cost to District: $18,422

Prev Next

25.

School District: Dudley/Charlton

Cost to District: $22,496

Charter Aid to District: $2,052

Net Cost to District: $20,044

Prev Next

24.

School District: Northbridge

Cost to District: $33,327

Charter Aid to District: $12,083

Net Cost to District: $21,244

Prev Next

23.

School District: Milford

Cost to District: $40,572

Charter Aid to District: $3,572

Net Cost to District: $37,000

Prev Next

22.

School District: Millbury

Cost to District: $54,292

Charter Aid to District: $14,254

Net Cost to District: $40,038

Prev Next

21.

School District: Spencer/East Brookfield

Cost to District: $55,531

Charter Aid to District: $4,465

Net Cost to District: $51,066

Prev Next

20.

School District: Westborough

Cost to District: $72,435

Charter Aid to District: $4,465

Net Cost to District: $67,970

Prev Next

19.

School District: Leicester

Cost to District: $203,752

Charter Aid to District: $84,398

Net Cost to District: $119,354

Prev Next

18.

School District: Gardner

Cost to District: $172,770

Charter Aid to District: $13,395

Net Cost to District: $121,805

Prev Next

17.

School District: Webster 

Cost to District: $172,922

Charter Aid to District: $41,207

Net Cost to District: $131,715

Prev Next

16.

School District: Auburn

Cost to District: $273,198

Charter Aid to District: $16,967

Net Cost to District: $256,231

Prev Next

15.

School District: West Boylston

Cost to District: $303,985

Charter Aid to District: $16,967

Net Cost to District: $​287,018

Prev Next

14.

School District: Harvard

Cost to District: $305,628

Charter Aid to District: $17,860

Net Cost to District: $287,768

Prev Next

13.

School District: Berlin/Boylston

Cost to District: $337,846

Charter to District: $20,539

Net Cost to District: $317,307

Prev Next

12.

School District: Northborough/Southborough

Cost to District: $374,184

Charter to District: $25,004

Net Cost to District: $349,180

Prev Next

11.

School District: Oxford

Cost to District: $420,029

Charter to District: $64,427

Net Cost to District: $355,602

Prev Next

10.

School District: Winchendon

Cost to District: $509,404

Charter to District: $116,356

Net Cost to District: $393,048

Prev Next

9.

School District: Wachusett

Cost to District: $483,187

Charter to District: $41,354

Net Cost to District: $441,833

Prev Next

8.

School District: Clinton

Cost to District: $528,505

Charter to District: $44,650

Net Cost to District: $483,855

Prev Next

7.

School District: Grafton

Cost to District: $549,995

Charter to District: $55,908

Net Cost to District: $494,046

Prev Next

6.

School District: Lunenburg

Cost to District: $631,804

Charter to District: $128,785

Net Cost to District: $502,019

Prev Next

5.

School District: Leominster

Cost to District: $1,003,937

Charter to District: $129,592

Net Cost to District: $874,345

Prev Next

4.

School District: Shrewsbury

Cost to District: $1,056,342

Charter to District: $72,333

Net Cost to District: $984,009

Prev Next

3.

School District: Fitchburg

Cost to District: $2,487,375

Charter to District: $58,938

Net Cost to District: $2,047,691

Prev Next

2.

School District: Marlborough

Cost to District: $5,792,592

Charter to District: $760,599

Net Cost to District: $5,031,993

Prev Next

1.

School District: Worcester

Cost to District: $24,819,491

Charter to District: $2,671,785

Net Cost to District: $22,147,706

 
 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

 

X

Stay Connected — Free
Daily Email