| | Advanced Search

 

Monfredo: Former Worcester Public School Member Publishes Book—A professional manual for students and professionals

QCC 50th, Celebrating Students: Ato Howard—A Biomedical Engineering student on the rise

MA Beauty Insider: Pedi Nation – Get the Best Pedicure Ever—A guide to finding a pristine pedi place

Fit for Life: Fail to Plan? Plan to Fail—Plan and prioritize, and you will prevail

Tom Finneran: Running on Envy—America's doctors run the gauntlet of envy

Arthur Schaper: Justina: Still Not Free—The crusade continues

Central MA Up + Comer: Vision Advertising CEO Laura Briere—Meet Central MA's rising stars...

FlyORH: Vote for Worcester in JetBlue Contest—Supporting ORH and JetBlue....

Catch the Moscow Festival Ballet With Your WOO Card—Where will you be WOOing this weekend?

Acclaimed Author Leah Hager Cohen to Give Reading at Holy Cross—Will read from new novel 'No Book but…

 
 

slides: Worcester Ranked 63rd Best Performing City For Business

Saturday, December 07, 2013

 

Worcester lags compared to other large metropolitan areas in the nation when it comes to jobs and economic growth.

The city improved in longer-term salaries and wages, but it slipped in one-year job growth according to a newly released survey ranking the “best-performing” cities in the nation.

In the Milken Institute's Best-Performing Cities index of 2013, Worcester's overall rank was 63rd out of 200 large metropolitan areas in the United States.

"The fact Worcester is competing well with top cities across the nation on key fundamentals is a good sign we are positioned for continued growth," responded Tim Murray, the head of the Worcester Regional Chamber of Commerce.

That rank was up to 34 in 2012, and 41 in 2011. But as recent as 2010, Worcester's position was much lower at 129.

A bright spot in the city's rankings, Worcester perennially does well in the number of “highly concentrated high-tech industries,” which measures the number of high-technology industries compared to the U.S. average.

But the city lagged behind the U.S. average between 2011 and 2012 in both relative growth and high-tech sector output growth.

Job and GDP data came from the recent 2012 fiscal year, while wage and salary figures were taken from up to 2011.

Survey methodology

The Milken Institute's “best-performing” cities survey shows where jobs are being created and sustained in metropolitan areas across the nation. The index uses measures of job, wage and technology performance to rank the nation's 200 large metropolitan areas and 179 smaller metros.

The survey's authors said technology and energy were the biggest forces behind the best performers.

"Job creation is the key measure of long-term economic vitality of America's urban areas," according to Ross DeVol, the chief research officer of the Milken Institute and one of the report's authors. "Many of our financial and social challenges can best be addressed by developing local strategies to foster high-quality jobs, and our Best-Performing Cities are showing the way," DeVol said in a prepared statement.

Unlike other "best places" rankings, the institute's survey does not use quality-of-life metrics, such as commute times, housing costs, or crime rates. In the index, employment growth is weighted most heavily due to its importance to community vitality, while wage and salary growth measures the quality of jobs.

Geographic areas are divided along the terms and definitions used by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget. In the Worcester region, that population amounted to 806,163.

Other regions in New England

Among the best performers in the Northeast, the Cambridge-Newton-Framingham region in Massachusetts topped New England at 23rd, down from 8th in 2012.

Boston-Quincy kept its 46th ranking, while the Peabody region northeast of Boston fell from 17th to 50th this year.

 

Related Slideshow: New England’s Best Performing Cities 2013: Milken Institute Study

Which cities and metropolitan areas in New England are poised for bright growth prospects? Which lag behind? Below are New England's Best Performing Cities as ranked by The Milken Institute in their national study, "Best-Performing Cities 2013." 

Prev Next

#13 Norwich-New London CT

Population: 274170

2013 Rank: 187

2012 Rank: 152


5-yr Job Growth Rank: 91

1-yr Job Growth Rank: 179


5-yr Wage/Salary Growth Rank: 121

1-yr Wage/Salary Growth Rank: 184


5-yr Relative High Tech GDP Growth Rank: 200

1-yr Relative High Tech GDP Growth Rank: 181

Prev Next

#12 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River RI-MA

Population: 1601374

2013 Rank: 148

2012 Rank: 130


5-yr Job Growth Rank: 144

1-yr Job Growth Rank: 161


5-yr Wage/Salary Growth Rank: 127

1-yr Wage/Salary Growth Rank: 122


5-yr Relative High Tech GDP Growth Rank: 47

1-yr Relative High Tech GDP Growth Rank: 147

Prev Next

#11 New Haven-Milford CT

Population: 862813

2013 Rank: 142

2012 Rank: 109


5-yr Job Growth Rank: 124

1-yr Job Growth Rank: 131


5-yr Wage/Salary Growth Rank: 122

1-yr Wage/Salary Growth Rank: 149


5-yr Relative High Tech GDP Growth Rank: 194

1-yr Relative High Tech GDP Growth Rank: 146

Prev Next

#10 Portland-South Portland-Biddeford ME

Population: 518117

2013 Rank: 137

2012 Rank: 91


5-yr Job Growth Rank: 86

1-yr Job Growth Rank: 165


5-yr Wage/Salary Growth Rank: 98

1-yr Wage/Salary Growth Rank: 146


5-yr Relative High Tech GDP Growth Rank: 101

1-yr Relative High Tech GDP Growth Rank: 103

Prev Next

#9 Springfield MA

Population: 697258

2013 Rank: 127

2012 Rank: 154


5-yr Job Growth Rank: 58

1-yr Job Growth Rank: 140


5-yr Wage/Salary Growth Rank: 108

1-yr Wage/Salary Growth Rank: 160


5-yr Relative High Tech GDP Growth Rank: 70

1-yr Relative High Tech GDP Growth Rank: 34

Prev Next

#8 Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk CT

Population: 933835

2013 Rank: 106

2012 Rank: 94


5-yr Job Growth Rank: 125

1-yr Job Growth Rank: 132


5-yr Wage/Salary Growth Rank: 129

1-yr Wage/Salary Growth Rank: 49


5-yr Relative High Tech GDP Growth Rank: 183

1-yr Relative High Tech GDP Growth Rank: 190

Prev Next

#7 Rockingham County-Strafford County NH

Population: 421939

2013 Rank: 91

2012 Rank: 60


5-yr Job Growth Rank: 66

1-yr Job Growth Rank: 123


5-yr Wage/Salary Growth Rank: 128

1-yr Wage/Salary Growth Rank: 106


5-yr Relative High Tech GDP Growth Rank: 62

1-yr Relative High Tech GDP Growth Rank: 185

Prev Next

#6 Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford CT

Population: 1214400

2013 Rank: 85

2012 Rank: 93


5-yr Job Growth Rank: 100

1-yr Job Growth Rank: 136


5-yr Wage/Salary Growth Rank: 99

1-yr Wage/Salary Growth Rank: 72


5-yr Relative High Tech GDP Growth Rank: 77

1-yr Relative High Tech GDP Growth Rank: 76

Prev Next

#5 Manchester-Nashua NH

Population: 402922

2013 Rank: 72

2012 Rank: 126


5-yr Job Growth Rank: 123

1-yr Job Growth Rank: 143


5-yr Wage/Salary Growth Rank: 114

1-yr Wage/Salary Growth Rank: 41


5-yr Relative High Tech GDP Growth Rank: 6

1-yr Relative High Tech GDP Growth Rank: 141

Prev Next

#4 Worcester MA

Population: 806163

2013 Rank: 63

2012 Rank: 34


5-yr Job Growth Rank: 73

1-yr Job Growth Rank: 166


5-yr Wage/Salary Growth Rank: 74

1-yr Wage/Salary Growth Rank: 61


5-yr Relative High Tech GDP Growth Rank: 55

1-yr Relative High Tech GDP Growth Rank: 152

Prev Next

#3 Peabody MA

Population: 755618

2013 Rank: 50

2012 Rank: 17


5-yr Job Growth Rank: 30

1-yr Job Growth Rank: 107


5-yr Wage/Salary Growth Rank: 54

1-yr Wage/Salary Growth Rank: 55


5-yr Relative High Tech GDP Growth Rank: 114

1-yr Relative High Tech GDP Growth Rank: 184

Prev Next

#2 Boston-Quincy MA

Population: 1926030

2013 Rank: 46

2012 Rank: 46


5-yr Job Growth Rank: 53

1-yr Job Growth Rank: 100


5-yr Wage/Salary Growth Rank: 72

1-yr Wage/Salary Growth Rank: 79


5-yr Relative High Tech GDP Growth Rank: 34

1-yr Relative High Tech GDP Growth Rank: 38

Prev Next

#1 Cambridge-Newton-Framingham MA

Population: 1537215

2013 Rank: 23

2012 Rank: 8


5-yr Job Growth Rank: 38

1-yr Job Growth Rank: 112


5-yr Wage/Salary Growth Rank: 17

1-yr Wage/Salary Growth Rank: 29


5-yr Relative High Tech GDP Growth Rank: 31

1-yr Relative High Tech GDP Growth Rank: 70

 
 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.




Commenting is not available in this channel entry.