| | Advanced Search

 

Tom Finneran: Running on Envy—America's doctors run the gauntlet of envy

Arthur Schaper: Justina: Still Not Free—The crusade continues

Central MA Up + Comer: Vision Advertising CEO Laura Briere—Meet Central MA's rising stars...

FlyORH: Vote for Worcester in JetBlue Contest—Supporting ORH and JetBlue....

Catch the Moscow Festival Ballet With Your WOO Card—Where will you be WOOing this weekend?

Acclaimed Author Leah Hager Cohen to Give Reading at Holy Cross—Will read from new novel 'No Book but…

NEW: Michael Graham Taking Conservative Talk Show to Atlanta—Headed for a warmer climate

NEW: Worcester’s Wormtown Brewery Wins Denver Int’l Beer Award—A major honor bestowed to a local brewery

Paul Giorgio: Elizabeth Warren is Right on Student Loans—MINDSETTER Paul Giorgio examines the student debt crisis

Central MA College Standout: Smith College’s Megan Baker—Spotlight on a bright student...

 
 

Worcester’s Most Dangerous Neighborhoods

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

 

Your chances of being a victim of violent crime in Worcester are one in 100.

And in the Great Brook Valley neighborhood, those odds rise to one in 31. That part of the city with the greatest rate of crime is followed by Chandler Hill (one in 36), Belmont Hill/Shrewsbury Street (one in 49), and Chandler Street/Park Avenue (one in 66).

Going hand in hand with violent crime, rates of property crime in Great Brook Valley affect one in 14 residents.

With above average crime rates, public perception in Worcester ranks the issue as a large, looming concern — but it is one that's being addressed through prevention and revitalization efforts and community policing.

“In general, there's been an uptick in car break-ins,” said long-time city councilor Kathleen Toomey. “And there's been an uptick in certain areas of the city of thefts. But I wouldn't say it's extraordinary.”

“But is it more than we'd want? Yes,” she added.

Statistics and comparison

In a ranking of cities using violent and property crimes data from the Federal Bureau of Investigations, Worcester has the ignoble distinction of being ranked one of the “100 most dangerous cities in the U.S.” by the real-estate neighborhood search website Neighborhood Scout.

The online resource is created by Location, Inc., a Worcester company that bills itself as a leader of location-based data and risk analysis information.

Using 2011 figures, the most recent year available, Worcester made the list at 91. Per capita, the city's crime index came in at 13, making Worcester safer than 13 percent of cities nationwide.

Last year's rankings didn't include Worcester among the top 100.

Violent crimes for the year analyzed included 11 murders, 38 rapes, 412 robberies, and 1,353 assaults. Those numbers put Worcester's per capita rate of violent crime at 2.33 times the statewide average by comparison.

That rate was 30 percent and 64 percent higher than the county's next two largest cities, Fitchburg and Leominster, respectively. Both of which have populations four-times smaller than Worcester.

The property crime rate in Worcester was 34.05 crimes per 1,000 residents, putting that metric above the national (29.1) and state (22.59) median.

In Great Brook Valley, the neighborhood with the greatest amount of reported crime, the property crime rate was 71.07 per 1,000 residents.

Burglaries, thefts, and motor vehicle thefts are included in that tally.

In terms of crime density, the Chandler Street/Park Avenue area of Worcester tops the list with a reported 1,348 crimes per square mile.

Toomey said the reality was that Worcester was an urban city. But, “the police department is doing an excellent job with the resources that we have,” she said. “The chief allocates resources well,” putting “feet on the ground” in neighborhoods that need it most.

The number of officers are down, according to a 2012 Worcester Regional Research Bureau report that tallied 64 fewer uniformed staff between 1998 and 2012.

“The chief has really been creative in being able to stretch his budget,” Toomey continued.

The result? “We have had a tighter handle on what we do have.”

Policing and prevention

The Worcester Police Department's organizational structure has revolved around a community policing approach that partners with community groups.

The department's “split force model” uses geographically assigned patrols and liaison officers that work with neighborhood watch groups and schools.

Some 50-plus watch groups organized by neighborhood act to communicate concerns to police, Police Chief Gary Gemme has said in describing the approach.

Lorraine Laurie, a volunteer with the Green Island neighborhood watch, said the effort hearkened back to days when you knew the officer on your street.

“I can't see policing without the community policing,” she said. A volunteer crime watch coordinator for 14 years, Laurie said crime was cyclical and there was no economic boundaries to its victims. “Crime is all over.”

The police department also organizes a “goods for guns” buy-back program and works with Worcester public schools on a youth leadership and empowerment campaign called Affected.

The efforts “have made a significance difference,” Toomey said, recognizable by residents and business people.

The research bureau's public safety report found property crime in the city had gradually declined over the previous 15 years, while violent crime had remained flat.

Calls to the department for more information were not returned in time for this story.

Across the county, crime prevention is a top priority for Worcester County District Attorney Joseph Early Jr., who said his office invested over $100,000 annually in drug forfeiture money to community and nonprofit groups.

The funds go toward summer camps, community projects, and revitalization efforts. “We put a big, big focus on intervention and prevention,” Early said. “We can't arrest our way out.”

Intervention and revitalization

Community outreach presentations by the district attorney's office to youth, elderly, and community groups have reached over 43,000 people this year.

Intervention efforts include youth and adult diversion programs that have minor offenders participate in court-ordered community service. The district attorney's office said 1,489 youth have entered court diversion since that program's start in 2008 — and in that time only 22 reoffended afterwards as youth.

In the greater Piedmont area of Worcester, a community development corporation, Worcester Common Ground, Inc., works to rebuild housing and address the concerns of residents there.

Common Ground Executive Director Yvette Lavigne said residents faced challenges around non-owner-occupied properties and dilapidated and abandoned buildings. Her organization purchases properties to rehab for safe, affordable housing.

But the closure of the People in Peril Shelter has had the effect of shifting the population that homeless shelter once served, observed Lavigne.

“A lot of folks without shelter creates an unsettling feeling with neighbors, and they're scared,” she said, although not directly contributing to crime.

 

Related Slideshow: Worcester’s Most Dangerous Neighborhoods

Neighborhood search website Neighborhood Scout indexed violent and property crimes data from the Federal Bureau of Investigations to determine the crime rates on a neighborhood-by-neighborhood basis in Worcester. The slides below show the overall crime index (a score of 100 is best) as well as the per capita crime rates broken down by violent and property crime. The data is sourced from 2011 figures, the most recent year available from the FBI. The online resource is created by Location, Inc., a Worcester-area company that bills itself as a leader of location-based data and risk analysis information.

Prev Next

38. Heard Street

Crime Index: 83 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 1.45

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 11.62

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 13.08

Prev Next

37. Main St / Goddard Memorial Dr

Crime Index: 73 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 2.74

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 14.61

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 17.35

Prev Next

36. Westchester / Assumption

Crime Index: 70 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 2.08

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 16.32

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 18.4

Prev Next

35 (tie). Mill St / Worcester State U

Crime Index: 67 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 1.63

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 17.96

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 19.59

Prev Next

35 (tie). Oakland Heights / Massasoit

Crime Index: 67 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 5.69

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 14.1

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 19.78

Prev Next

33 (tie). Jamesville / Ludlow

Crime Index: 65 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 4.14

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 16.57

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 20.71

Prev Next

33 (tie). Burncoat

Crime Index: 65 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 1.63

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 18.88

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 20.51

Prev Next

31. Chadwick Square

Crime Index: 61 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 4.88

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 17.78

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 22.66

Prev Next

30. Sunderland

Crime Index: 60 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 3.17

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 19.67

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 22.85

Prev Next

29. Webster Square

Crime Index: 59 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 12

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 11.59

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 23.59

Prev Next

28. Westwood Hills

Crime Index: 57 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 2.56

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 21.65

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 24.21

Prev Next

27. North Worcester / Summit

Crime Index: 55 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 5.33

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 19.93

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 25.26

Prev Next

26. Pleasant St.

Crime Index: 48 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 5.99

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 22.98

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 28.97

Prev Next

25 (tie). Greendale

Crime Index: 47 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 3.35

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 26.56

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 29.9

Prev Next

25 (tie). Bloomingdale

Crime Index: 47 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 9.12

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 21.07

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 30.19

Prev Next

23. Clark U / Main St

Crime Index: 46 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 2.79

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 27.94

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 30.73

Prev Next

22. Tatnuck / West Tatnuck

Crime Index: 45 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 2.39

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 29.07

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 31.46

Prev Next

21. Lakeview

Crime Index: 43 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 4.32

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 28.09

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 32.42

Prev Next

20. Holy Cross / College St

Crime Index: 39 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 0.82

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 34.26

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 35.08

Prev Next

19 (tie). Columbus Park

Crime Index: 37 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 9.73

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 27.14

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 36.87

Prev Next

19 (tie). Hamilton

Crime Index: 37 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 10.95

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 25.81

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 36.76

Prev Next

17. Brittan Square

Crime Index: 34 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 10.44

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 28.86

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 39.3

Prev Next

16. Pinecrest

Crime Index: 33 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 5.65

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 34.12

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 39.77

Prev Next

15 (tie). City Center

Crime Index: 29 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 16.8

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 27.03

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 43.83

Prev Next

15 (tie). South Worcester

Crime Index: 29 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 14.9

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 29.26

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 44.16

Prev Next

13. Beaver Brook

Crime Index: 28 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 12.9

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 31.85

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 44.75

Prev Next

12 (tie). Swan Avenue

Crime Index: 24 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 11.72

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 37.37

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 49.09

Prev Next

12 (tie). June Street

Crime Index: 24 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 8.05

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 41.46

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 49.51

Prev Next

10 (tie). University Park

Crime Index: 20 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 12.42

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 41.75

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 54.18

Prev Next

10 (tie). Quinsigamond Village / College Hill

Crime Index: 20 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 12.15

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 42.45

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 54.6

Prev Next

8 (tie). Umass Medical / Lake Ave N

Crime Index: 16 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 7.54

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 53.28

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 60.82

Prev Next

8 (tie). Water St / Grafton St

Crime Index: 16 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 21.62

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 40.39

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 62.01

Prev Next

6 (tie). Beverly Road

Crime Index: 15 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 7.64

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 55.73

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 63.37

Prev Next

6 (tie). WPI / Highland St

Crime Index: 15 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 11.31

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 51.74

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 63.05

Prev Next

4. Oak Hill

Crime Index: 13 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 21.26

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 46.78

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 68.04

Prev Next

3. Belmont Hill / Shrewsbury St

Crime Index: 8 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 20.38

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 61.97

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 82.35

Prev Next

2. Chandler Hill

Crime Index: 6 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 27.72

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 64.36

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 92.08

Prev Next

1. Great Brook Valley

Crime Index: 4 (100 is safest)

Violent Crimes per 1000 residents: 32.64

Property Crimes per 1000 residents: 71.07

Total Crimes per 1000 residents: 103.71

 
 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

Comments:

Iron Mike Farquhar

Funny how the Laws of Unintended Consequences work...

Your parents spend decades voting for Democrats – 'against the man' – and slowly all the jobs leave town.

What are you left with? Deep pockets of embedded poverty, illiteracy, high crime, and the inevitable formation of street gangs. Kids who might have done well in school, - gotten good-paying jobs, - raised good families, - instead end up dead or in jail, never knowing the children they've fathered.

And the cycle renews,...because you keep voting for Democrats who promise to fix it...

Edward Saucier

I don't agree with those figures & who the hell is Zeke Wright? And what are his credentials and where did he get his intel, the FBI? The FBI can't find there butts using both hands. The FBI lets murderers loose, like Whitey Bulger, in exchange for information.If Zeke is as crazy as the commentor above me we're all in deep do-do.

Christopher DeWitt

As the economy goes you will absolutely see crime rise.
The real alarming thing is that more than half of the crimes committed are not reported. I had 5 friends who go to Worcester state with car break-ins. Not one reported it to the Police.

Edward Saucier

As the economy goes down the crime rate goes up. As the labor movement goes down so does the economy. The unions made the middle class in this country and the republicasn are trying to destroy all that matters for the working class and make this nation fascist.

Iron Mike Farquhar

Yes, Ed [I see you're up from your nap] unions DID improve the lot of labor,...up to a point.

BUT, they got taken over by thugs, crooks, gangsters, the Mafia, and socialists....who looted their pension funds, bought Democrat politicians, and bullied industries to the point that they moved South, then off shore. Unions killed the 'Golden Goose'.

Want to understand why so much US industry has relocated to China? Study the history of the labor movement in the 20th Century. Where IS Jimmy Hoffa? Who shot Jock Yablonski – and why?

Edward Saucier

What up to a point Mike? The middle class in America rises and falls exponentially with the union movement. That's a fact that all the studies have proven.

Some of those things about unions are true but what about the corporations. There are more crooks running them than there are running unions. There are so many more corporations. FYI - the corporations brought the recessions and the depressions and wars that we've seen throughout history.

Corporations moved to China for their cheap labor and many are starting to move back here now. We don't know where Jimmy Hoffa is, most likely he was put in a car crusher in a NJ junk yard where a lot of those guys went. And we knew United Mine Workers President Tony Boyle gave the order to kill Jock Yablonski.

And we know the mob stole the Teamsters Central States Pension money to build Las Vegas. Yet the bad unionists are few and far between the corporate rats who will sell the country down the tubes for money. The corporations were the ones who hired thugs to beat the unionists down in the 1920's and 30's etc..

So Mike, don't pee in my ear and tell me it's raining. I lived union for over thirty years. I know a lot about the union history and the so week labor laws we have. You are a right-wing sucker who backs people who will sell you out for a dollar and not think twice about it. So for now we all have choices. But that won't last much longer unless people like you wake up (from your long naps)and start growing a brain.

Iron Mike Farquhar

The only people 'peeing in your ear' Ed – are the union leaders, the Dems, and the socialists.

But hey, if you LIKE your union, - you can KEEP your union! It's just that the JOB may go overseas.

Your personal union credentials need no broadcasting Ed, - we've all seen and sympathized by how totally you have been indoctrinated [aka brainwashed]. Your 'facts' are those recited to you by the shop stewards.... They're sort of like Al Gore's rantings about man-made global warming killing polar bears.

How is employment vs welfare doing since unions backed Obama in 2008?

Edward Saucier

What a nimrod you are Elmer




Commenting is not available in this channel entry.