| | Advanced Search

 

NEW: No Strike—UMass Memorial and Nurses Reach Agreement—NEW: No Strike -- UMass Memorial and Nurses…

Murray’s Career - The Good and The Bad—Murray's Career -- The Good and The Bad

American Antiquarian Society to Begin New Hands-on History Program—First program begins June 1st

Catch Wool Days at Old Sturbridge Village With Your WOO Card—Great ideas for the week...

Zona Hurls No-Hitter to Keep SPM Baseball in Playoff Hunt—Pitcher's success continues...

Who is the Best High School Boys Lacrosse Player in Central Mass.?—Take your pick...

Remembering Worcester’s Tornado of 1953—A look back in the wake of the…

NEW: Representative Fresolo Resigns—NEW: Representative Fresolo Resigns

Worcester Smart Grid Roll Out Causing Controversy—Worcester Smart Grid Roll Out Causing Controversy

New: City Councilor-at-Large O’Brien Will Not Seek Re-election—O'Brien is former mayor and councilman

 
 

Candy Mero Carlson: Brown Won’t Be There for Central Mass

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

 

The jobs numbers released last Friday are a sign that our economy is moving in the right direction. But there is still more work to be done to move our country forward and put people back to work here in Worcester and across the country. In the Massachusetts Senate race, there is a clear choice between Scott Brown and Elizabeth Warren when it comes to jobs and the economy.

Last fall, with a quarter of a million people unemployed across Massachusetts, Scott Brown voted in lockstep with the Republican Party against three of President Obama’s jobs bills that would have helped put people to work and strengthen our economy. Elizabeth Warren has fought throughout her career for working families, and she will fight to support jobs for people here in Worcester and across the Commonwealth.

It shouldn’t really come as a surprise that Scott Brown would side with Republican leaders in Congress to block President Obama’s agenda on jobs. During his time in the Senate, whenever it really counts, Brown has joined Mitch McConnell and his fellow Republicans in standing up for big corporations, Big Oil, and billionaires instead of regular people here in Massachusetts.

Just recently, when Brown was asked if he would vote to extend tax cuts for 98 percent of families and 97 percent of small businesses, he said his answer would be a “crystal clear” no unless those at the top got even bigger tax breaks. He said this, even while he continues to support sending billions in tax subsidies to big oil companies.

On Wall Street reform, while Elizabeth Warren has been fighting her whole career to make sure the big banks play by the rules and compete on a level playing field, Brown has worked to weaken the Dodd-Frank law before and after it was passed and delay its implementation.

Scott Brown also showed his true colors on women’s issues, joining an extreme conservative Senator from Missouri to co-sponsor an amendment that would have allowed employers to deny women important health care services, including access to contraception.

None of this should be a surprise: On issues important to people in Central Massachusetts and across the Commonwealth, Brown just hasn’t been there for us. In fact, while Elizabeth Warren accepted an invitation to debate in Worcester, Scott Brown turned down the bipartisan invite from groups including the local Republican Committee. I want a Senator who believes Worcester is important; Scott Brown clearly would rather spend his time elsewhere.

In the past several weeks, Scott Brown has been spending much of his time launching false personal attacks against Elizabeth Warren. The reason for this is clear: Scott Brown doesn’t want to talk about his record. Despite his frequent claims to be a bipartisan and independent voice for the people of Massachusetts, Brown can’t hide his history of standing with the Tea Party and Republicans against the interests of families here in the Commonwealth. I can only question: Which Scott Brown will we get when he doesn't have to worry about reelection for six years?

The Senate election in Massachusetts could play a pivotal role in determining which party controls the United States Senate. If Scott Brown is reelected and the Republicans regain the majority, Brown would vote to make Mitch McConnell Majority Leader – a man who said his top priority was to make President Obama a one-term President.

If Republicans control the Senate, they would be able to set the agenda, and it would put extreme conservatives in charge of key committees. And it would allow the GOP to have the final say on Supreme Court nominees. At last week’s debate, Scott Brown let us know his model Supreme Court Justice is Antonin Scalia, who is a vocal critic of Roe v. Wade and has said there is no right to equal protection for women under the Constitution.

Brown knows this, and that’s why he’s been going around the country raising money by telling people this race could put Republicans in control in the Senate and that his election might be “the only sure hedge to a potential second term for President Obama.”

Scott Brown doesn’t want to talk about his record of standing with Republicans in Congress in support of billionaires and big corporations, but local voters deserve to know what’s at stake in this election. Elizabeth knows that people in Central Massachusetts should be able to hear from the candidates about the important issues affecting families in this part of the state.

Elizabeth Warren has spent her life standing up for working families and small businesses, and that’s why we need her voice in the United States Senate.

Candy Mero Carlson is the Chair of the Worcester Democratic City Committee.

 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

Comments:

Stephen Quist

I have a deep respect for Candy Carlson and all that she has been able to accomplish over time.
However in this piece I disagree completely with Ms Carlsons premise.
Senator Scott Brown has proven in 2 short years that he has what our country is missing so badly today - the ability to cross the aisle and pass legislation that benefits our country and our state in particular.
We need to elect more moderates to our halls of Congress that actually put citizenship first before partisianship.....

Kristin Mayo

Candy Carlson, thank you for this very clearly written statement of Scott Brown’s votes and full support of his Republican Party--except occasionally when he is allowed to cross over to claim bipartisanship when his vote is not needed. When Scott arrive in DC after winning the 2010 special election, he was hailed and feted by his Republican Party as # 41-- the vote that allowed the Republicans to filibuster all the Democrats efforts to improve the economy by voting Dem 59/ Rep 41. Scott has worked hard to present himself as bipartisan to voters who don’t check his voting record.

Harvey Beehive

Don't you liberals ever get tired of repeating the same old tired "standing up for big oil and millionaires" BS? The American people sure have, as will be clear on election day....

Harry Huckum

Guys like me in the middle class are tired of liberal scum bag politicians like Jimmy O'Day that advocate for more taxes for all of us hard working people while he take the per-diem for travel and uses the fed tax loophole for legislators so that he pays no federal income tax.

Your whole platform is based on lies.

For instance Warren is a Millionaire as are many of her donors.
She works for a Billionaire (Harvard) that pays no taxes.
She gets paid $370k to teach one class.
She lies about her heritage.
She lies about helping the middle class.

To borrow from Romney, Attacking Sen. Brown is not an agenda Professor Warren.

Harry Huckum

For a dose of facts (Democrats don't like facts, they get in the way of their agenda which is lies) read Glenn Farber's new blog and the maiden post on Warren titled, Parsing Warren's double speak. Great tome on the duplicitous professor.

Here is a link to it.
http://bit.ly/VrzUB1

Christopher Pinto

Today the Telegram endorsed Scott Brown

Stephen Quist

@CP: A well deserved endorsement I might add...........the success of bipartisianship and the future of our country rests on the election of more moderates from both parties like Senator Brown who has an inate ability to work for the best interests of our stae in particular and our country as a whole

Tony Chandler

The truth about "Candy" is she only cares about unions. That's why she isn't supporting Brown!

Just like the bridge between Shrewsbury and Worcester. The contract - 70 million - well guess what - Jim O'Day (who's bought and paid for by the union) wanted to increase the bridge cost to $140 million. Guess who was going to get the job bid - yep - you got it - the unions.

There are only 18% of the population in Massachusetts that belong to a union. We need to bring Right to Work to this state and get rid of hacks that run unions.

Scott Brown will win and so won't Romney. Finally two people we can count on to help us out of this mess!!




Write your comment...

You must be logged in to post comments.