| | Advanced Search


Monfredo: Former Worcester Public School Member Publishes Book—A professional manual for students and professionals

QCC 50th, Celebrating Students: Ato Howard—A Biomedical Engineering student on the rise

MA Beauty Insider: Pedi Nation – Get the Best Pedicure Ever—A guide to finding a pristine pedi place

Fit for Life: Fail to Plan? Plan to Fail—Plan and prioritize, and you will prevail

Tom Finneran: Running on Envy—America's doctors run the gauntlet of envy

Arthur Schaper: Justina: Still Not Free—The crusade continues

Central MA Up + Comer: Vision Advertising CEO Laura Briere—Meet Central MA's rising stars...

FlyORH: Vote for Worcester in JetBlue Contest—Supporting ORH and JetBlue....

Catch the Moscow Festival Ballet With Your WOO Card—Where will you be WOOing this weekend?

Acclaimed Author Leah Hager Cohen to Give Reading at Holy Cross—Will read from new novel 'No Book but…


Sen. Brown Maintains Edge In Central Mass

Monday, September 17, 2012


Republican Senator Scott Brown is still running strong in the region even as Democratic challenger Elizabeth Warren makes gains elsewhere in the Bay State.

According to results released by the Western New England University Polling Institute on Sunday, Warren leads Brown by 6 points, 50-44, among likely voters statewide.

The survey, conducted from September 6 to 13, coincided with the tail end of the Democratic National Convention where Warren delivered a prime-time address, which may account for some of her boost in the poll.

In the Polling Institute's last survey of the Massachusetts Senate race, conducted at the end of May, Warren led by just two points.

Robert Boatright, a Political Science professor at Clark University, said the poll was not without its shortcomings, from a relatively small sample size to a lack of under-30 voters.

"Despite that, I think the poll is probably a good sign for the Warren campaign," he said.

"She continues to consolidate the Democratic vote, apparently, but I think the race is a lot closer than this poll suggests."

Regional Breakdown

Support for Warren was most pronounced in Western Mass, where she enjoyed a 61-33 advantage over Brown in the Polling Institute's findings.

Warren also came in ahead among voters in Boston and its suburbs by a margin of 52-43. Respondents from the North and South Shores favored Brown slightly to Warren, 49-47.

In Central Mass, however, Brown still commands a sizable lead of 50-38, with 12 percent of those surveyed still undecided on the highly-contested Senate race.

The strong support for Brown in the region is in line with his performance during the 2010 special election in which he defeated Attorney General Martha Coakley to succeed the late Ted Kennedy in representing the Commonwealth in Washington.

Several of Brown's best towns, where he secured more than 70 percent of the vote two years ago, are located in Central Mass.

Winning Over Worcester

Both candidates have made appearances in New England's second largest city in September.

Brown met with supporters and small business owners at Worcester's Absolute Machinery, Inc. at the beginning of the month, where he was joined by City Councilor Konnie Lukes, one of the co-chairs of his "Democrats for Brown" coalition.

Warren spoke at the Democratic City Committee's Unity Breakfast last Saturday, appearing alongside Congressman Jim McGovern, Lieutenant Governor Tim Murray and Massachusetts Democratic Party Chair John Walsh.

However, Boatright doubted either candidate would zero in their efforts on a particular region of the Bay State. The race will hinge on undecided voters, and there has been no evidence that those still on the fence are more concentrated in one part of the state than another.

"Massachusetts is a small enough state that candidates can get around and focus on voters in all parts rather than coming up with a geographic strategy," he said.

"Warren will try to turn out votes in Worcester, to be certain, but I don't know that she'll work harder here than elsewhere."

50 Days To Go

With the Senate race winding down and only 50 days left before the election, both campaigns have shifted gears, and each candidate rolled out a first batch of negative ads.

"The surprise about the Brown-Warren race is not that it went negative, but that it took this long to go negative," said Morgan Marietta, a Political Science professor at UMass-Lowell.

"The two combatants are tied with seven weeks to go, so the tough shots are emerging and are likely to get worse."

State party organizations are gearing up for the fight as well.

"The polls are going to go up and down the next 50 days, and it’s going to be a close race, but the one thing that won’t change is that Professor Warren is a partisan ideologue with extremist views way outside the mainstream of the Massachusetts electorate," said Tim Buckley, communications director for the Massachusetts Republican Party.

"She is deeply hostile to our job creators, and is best known for being the founder of the radical Occupy protest movement and the originator of the ‘you didn’t build it’ mentality that credits government with the success of the private sector."

Mass Dems Communications Advisor Matt House said the party will continue to aggressively reach out to voters in Central Mass to make sure they understand what's at stake this election.

"It's clear that voters across the Commonwealth are supporting Elizabeth Warren because she's a fighter for small business and the middle-class," he said.

"Scott Brown's votes to put Wall Street and huge corporations over working families are catching up with him." 


Related Articles


Enjoy this post? Share it with others.


Stephen Jacoby

Tim Buckley has managed to work FIVE outright lies into a short two-sentence statement. I'm starting to wonder if lying has become a sport for Republicans who try to outdo each other with the most outrageous fibs they can come up with.

Lie #1: "...with extremeist views way outside the mainstream of the Massachusetts electorate." - Hmmmm.... if she's so far outside the mainstream, how come every poll in existence shows that more people support her than don't? She has the majority of voters on her side. By the very definition of the word, she is mainstream.

Lie #2: "She is deeply hostile to our job creators..." - No, she's just deeply hostile to those who would cheat and steal from us. She was a REPUBLICAN until 1980's and believes in helping businesses grow, but to do so in an ethical and legal manner. It's only when businesses cross over the line into deceptive practices and illegal behavior that she becomes hostile.

Lie #3 & #4 (scoring extra points with the "two-in-one"): "...and is best known for being the founder of the radical Occupy protest movement..." - First of all, she didn't found the Occupy movement. The actual founders (Kalle Lasn and Micah White) said they used some of her academic writings as partial of the foundation for what they are trying to accomplish, but to say she founded the movement is a lie. Plus, even if it were true, she is not best known for that. Her "claim to fame" is her work to create and set up the Federal Consumer Protection Agency, a watchdog with teeth, specifically created to protect consumers against the deceptive and illegal practices so often perpetrated by Corporate America against their own customers.

Lie #5: "...and the originator of the ‘you didn’t build it’ mentality that credits government with the success of the private sector." - Like all good propagandists who think the public is too stupid to check facts, Buckley uses a partial phrase taken out of context to support his lie. The ACTUAL quote was "you didn't build it ALONE!" The point being made at the time was that, as much as business owners do to create successful businesses, they couldn't do it without the people doing the actual work nd the customers who purchase their goods and services. It wasn't about government, it was about recognizing that someone can create a company but, without anyone to do the actual work or enough people to buy the product, the business will fail. The success of ANY business is a group effort involving everyone, not just the person who writes the checks.

bruce w

im confused about the headline. Don't the numbers say warren is ahead?

Hye Aghcheg

Have to hope the voters cast their ballots wisely in this race. If elected, Warren will be completely ineffective, because she will not work with those across the aisle. She is totally partisan in her politics and that's not what the Commonwealth needs. Scott Brown has represented us well and will continue doing the right thing. He votes on the issue, not by party. He has not sides with the Repubs or the Dems. If voters think back, they'll realize much of Ted Kennedy's success was due to his ability to work with people, not offend them. Voters should take a close look at Warren's tactics, before choosing to elect her. Do they really believe her rhetoric is going to get results in Washington?

Edward Saucier

Very good explanation by Steven Jacoby in a vain attempt to enlighten individuals who can not be educated due to a sever case of Stockholm Syndrome.

Republicans have a problem of doing certain thinks and saying that the democrats, liberals or anyone else outside their thought process are the ones who do them. Which is why they have the reputation of being pathological liars.

Liz Warren has come from behind to take the lead over "Scotty the Exagerator." Most likely after the debates many will see and hear why they should vote for her. Of course those "scarecrows" still on the yellow brick road will still be in the state of denial.

Harvey Beehive

Jacoby: If Warren is "mainstream", then how do you define extreme liberalism? She is so far left, she makes John Kerry look like Atilla the Hun. The polls are lopsided or skewed, just like they were for Martha Coakley. Warren will lose by at least 5 percentage points. So will Romney.

Write your comment...

You must be logged in to post comments.