| | Advanced Search

 

Catch Disney on Ice With Your WOO Card—The best places to use your WOO Card…

Paul Giorgio: Mr. Baker, MA Doesn’t Want a Liar for Governor—MA voters deserve a governor that will tell…

Patriots 2014 Schedule Set—The 2014 New England Patriots schedule has officially…

Central MA College Standout: Clark University’s Timothy Conley—Political Science major and track star

Organize + Energize: 4 Ways Getting Organized Will Save You Money—Stop wasting time and money

Patriots’ Day Patriots Primer—In Foxboro, the New England Patriots will begin…

Monfredo: Former Worcester Public School Member Publishes Book—A professional manual for students and professionals

QCC 50th, Celebrating Students: Ato Howard—A Biomedical Engineering student on the rise

MA Beauty Insider: Pedi Nation – Get the Best Pedicure Ever—A guide to finding a pristine pedi place

Fit for Life: Fail to Plan? Plan to Fail—Plan and prioritize, and you will prevail

 
 

Dr. Ravi Perry: The Removal of Public Pay Phones is Wrong

Saturday, September 08, 2012

 

Dr. Ravi Perry, GoLocalWorcester MINDSETTER™

The idea that the City should remove public pay phones as a crime deterrent is yet another embarrassment for Worcester public officials.

Instead of offering comprehensive solutions, the poorly conceived idea of removing public pay phones is the answer?

Where’s the investigation? Where’s the police response to such crimes? If the alleged crime exists, why not increase patrols in that area? Why not station police near those public pay phones?

Perhaps if there weren’t so many Worcester police on unnecessary construction details, we would have the man/woman power to seriously address alleged issues such as this in a way that empowers local neighborhoods – not in a way that further disadvantages communities. The removal of phones in a neighborhood with a high percentage of lower income populations will likely increase the inability of many families to access communication.

This decision could lead to serious problems, including disparate-impact discrimination claims, and other lawsuits. On its face, the stated purpose of the pay phone removal policy is to reduce drug trafficking within the established “perimeter.” However the impact is to remove public resources around a “perimeter” that is inclusive of mostly people of color. The idea is so ill conceived, I can only hope this idea was not actually thought through. The fact that the idea is even suggested is ludicrous.

I've heard that neighborhood organizations have lobbied for the removal of the phones and councilors are simply responding to constituents with this policy. However, leadership is not only about responsiveness, effective leadership is also about educating constituents as to what actions are both legally permissible and that uphold the rights of all.  The idea offered by city councilors also reeks of racialism and a lack of understanding about how to solve crime responsibly.

Meanwhile, news and ideas of councilors offers no facts, no number of calls used for alleged criminal activities, no data. Only allegations and innuendo.

The mere fact that elected councilors can recommend the removal of public resources available to tens of thousands to solve a problem that affects a significantly lower population of individuals is an embarrassment. As a result, any future “facts” will have been lost as the credibility of these councilors is called into question.

How could they make such allegations with unsubstantiated details?

Clearly, there are better ways to attempt to solve alleged drug trafficking. Removing public pay phones is not the answer. 

 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

Comments:

Steven Barrett

The crack about police details was unnecessary. Dr. Perry should know that construction details are manned by off-duty officers, and are not paid for out of the WPD budget. Eliminating them all wouldn't make a single additional officer available to "to seriously address alleged issues such as this".

I have no opinion one way or the other regarding the pay phones, but when Dr. Perry makes a misleading statement like this as part of his argument, it undermines the credibility of his whole position, at least in my eyes.

Harvey Beehive

Steven...you are correct when youb say that police details are not paid out of the WPD budget. However, we still pay the tab. The detail pay is calculated into the bid for the job and is ultimately reflected in higher rates. I think what Dr. Perry is saying is that there always seems to be plenty of manpower available for $30/hour detail work, but never enough for patrol cars or pfficers walking the beat. As far as the pay phones go, removing them is one of the dumbest ideas I've ever heard. Does anyone really think the removal of a few pay phones will curb drug sales? Heck, the DEA can't even stop it. Go figure...




Write your comment...

You must be logged in to post comments.