Welcome! Login | Register
 

Friday Financial Five – December 19th, 2014—Congress finally approved retroactive individual tax breaks

REPORT: Rondo Trade to Dallas is VERY Close—Celtics on the verge of trading Rondo

Massachusetts Adds 13,500 Jobs in November—The executive Office of Labor and Workforce Development…

RE/MAX New England: Pending Sales in Massachusetts Are Up—RE/MAX of New England's November Monthly Housing Report…

See A Christmas Carol at The Hanover Theatre with Your WOO Card—The weekend is fast approaching, and GoLocalWorcester brings…

Statement From Congressman McGovern: Regarding The Presidents U.S.- Cuba Policy and Alan Gross—Congressman McGovern speaks on the Presidents new US-Cuba…

Giorgio: Dick Cheney Needs to Stop Torturing Us—Just when you thought it was safe

National Academy of Inventors Names UMass Medical Professor the 2014 Fellow—UMass Medical Professor Phillip D. Zamore, PhD. has…

Bravehearts Release Schedule, Futures League Makes Changes—Worcester Bravehearts release their 2015 regular season schedule…

Horowitz: Game-Changing Global Climate Change Agreement Reached—For the first time ever, nearly all the…

 
 

Tim Cahill: Why the Vice Presidential Debate Matters

Tuesday, October 09, 2012

 

Tim Cahill, GoLocalWorcester MINDSETTER™

I may have to take back my firmly held sentiment that televised debates really do not matter after what happened after the first presidential debate last week. I was conditioned by the conventional wisdom that unless someone tells a whopper like Gerald Ford (Poland was not under Soviet domination in 1976), or completely freezes on a softball question (think Rick Perry), nobody will remember or care significantly about one evening in a two year-long campaign.

While neither of the two candidates fumbled badly on anything specific or created a "YouTube" moment, I am stunned by the amount of invective being hurled at President Obama for what was at worst a mediocre performance. Although he stumbled over his words occasionally and had far too many awkward pauses, I did not witness any meltdowns or obvious flubs that usually doom a candidate. His biggest mistake was that he gave Mitt Romney something he should not have; He allowed Mitt to look and sound presidential.

Now that millions of independent and undecided voters can now picture or imagine Mitt Romney as president, it will be up to Joe Biden to make sure that Paul Ryan does not get the same opportunity. At the end of the day, that is really the only thing that matters to people in a vice-presidential pick. Can that individual step up and assume the role of president if something happens to the president? Biden, despite his proclivity for gaffes and verbal blunders, has long ago passed that test. Paul Ryan, on the other hand, is still some ways away from passing.

There is no question that Congressman Ryan is whip-smart and extremely knowledgeable about budgets, deficits and the entitlement challenges that burden this country economically. But high-stake debates like the one that will take place Thursday are not like being a contestant on Jeopardy. If that was the setting, I have no doubt that Ryan would annihilate Biden. He would be Ken Jennings and Biden would be the Sean Connery character played by Darrell Hammond on SNL. The biggest test anyone running for high public office has to pass is can people imagine or visualize that person being President of the United States.

Obama passed the test with the "cool under pressure" demeanor he projected during the financial meltdown in October of 2008.  Sarah Palin, on the other hand, badly failed over and over again, even though she exceeded expectations in her debate with Joe Biden in 2008. Ryan has the difficult challenge of seeming like a grown-up, experienced, leader when in fact he sometimes appears on stage like he just received his Eagle Scout badge.  If he comes out dressed like he did when first chosen by Romney, in a sports jacket two sizes too large, he could end up reminding the public of Macauley Culkin in "Home Alone."

We all hate to admit that we judge our leaders performance often more on how they look and act, as opposed to what they say and stand for.  But if the recent debate analysis is any indication, that is exactly how we do judge winners and losers when it comes to debates. I am not sure if it is reassuring or scary that after more than two hundred years of choosing presidents, that is still what it comes down to. If Paul Ryan comes out of the debate reminding voters of the obnoxiously smartest man in Jeopardy history, then Democrats can only hope that Joe Biden does not remind anyone of an aging James Bond playing the same game.

 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.