Tom Finneran: Rooting for Congress

Email to a friend Permalink

Friday, January 31, 2014

Tom Finneran, GoLocalWorcester MINDSETTER™

It might seem out of place in the week in which the President gave his State of the Union address, but put me down as rooting loudly for Congress. And while you’re at it, put me down as hoping that more and more members of Congress will shelve the canned talking points they get from their respective parties and start talking to each other as fellow Americans.

The emergence of the “imperial presidency” did not begin with President Obama so let’s not blame him for the current state of affairs. Nor will the modern imperial presidency end with President Obama’s second term. Rather, the fault in this dangerous distortion of our system of checks and balances lies with us, the American people. We seem to have a juvenile wish for simplicity, for “decisions”, for easy solutions to hard problems, and for avoiding at all costs the notion of argument, disagreement, and debate.

A disturbing recent example—it’s no secret that the rollout of “Obamacare” was a spectacular embarrassment for the President. Nor is it a secret that certain parts of the law were not able to be implemented on the timetables which the law established. To this very messy state of affairs, the president has issued a set of waivers and/ or executive orders making unilateral changes in a law which governs every American. Consider that for a moment—in the United States of America, a nation founded on the wise distrust of putting unchecked power in the hands of any one individual, one person, our President, has asserted a power which he does not have. There should be universal shrieks about these actions, particularly from Congress.

In fact, Congressional Democrats should be shouting the loudest for this institutional intrusion into their explicit duties. If the law needs fixing then fix it. And if you don’t have the votes to do so, then cobble together an interim solution. Why oh why would any member of Congress, Republican or Democrat, so abjectly surrender on such matters. The system of checks and balances is far more important than any particular policy. Those checks and balances are constitutionally established and they should vanquish by a staggering margin any silly talk about “party loyalty”, party priorities, or similar irrelevancies. And, if the result is that this President, or, more importantly any President, is put into a politically awkward or difficult position, then that’s an unmitigated good. I don’t trust royal judgments. Neither did our forebears. And such awkward or difficult positions would be instructive to any President (and their increasingly haughty staffers) as they attempt to provide executive guidance to the nation.

Consider for a moment the infallibility of Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon, et. al. To even use the word infallible regarding any of these folks is to break out laughing. As is of course true if the same word were applied to any of us, the American people. We, all of us, including our Presidents, are flawed, often in multiple ways. Thus our very flawed “founding Fathers” recognized that universal limitation even in themselves as they devised a check on monarchical power. Power and authority were to be diffused, not concentrated.

All this of course is really basic American history and elementary civics. It’s not hard to grasp. Yet modern America seems terribly uneducated and uninterested in these dangerous matters. Consider the negative inferences of “gridlock”, one of the pejorative terms of our times. There is nothing wrong with gridlock. It should be understood as strong evidence that an idea or a proposal lacks broad support. In such cases proponents of change should go back to the drawing board, nipping, tucking, listening, and compromising with their critics, trying to find the right balance of interests and developing legitimate consensus.

Reflect upon the Congress’ abdication of its legitimate powers and duties in light of two other frequent intrusions into their institutional domain—judges who “legislate” from the bench and regulatory agencies which issue rules far beyond the plain meaning of statutory language. For years and years we have heard complaints about such institutional over-reach. Yet Congress appears supine in its acceptance of such theft of its constitutional prerogatives. Such theft, and its troubling trend toward increase, would be rapidly cured the moment Congress expresses its intent to curb such abuses, rewriting jurisdiction, revisiting statutes, and making clear its will regarding policy. I call it institutional spine. Let’s hope that Congress finds it, soon.

---

Related Slideshow: New England Communities With the Most Political Clout 2013

Related Articles

• Tom Finneran: A Good Man Earns High Office
• Tom Finneran: On Oprah, Barkley, and Bullying
• Tom Finneran: America’s New Grand Canyon
• Tom Finneran: President Obama’s New Year
• Tom Finneran: Dummies on Smartphones
• Tom Finneran: From Russia With Love
• Tom Finneran: Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and St. Ann’s Parish
• Tom Finneran: Just Say “Yes”
• Tom Finneran: MLK’s Haunted History
• Tom Finneran: Obama’s Dominoes

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

Email to a friend Permalink