What Matters at the Election Finish Line—Sunday Political Brunch - November 4, 2018
Sunday, November 04, 2018
“It’s’ the Economy, Stupid!” – The famed line from Democratic operative James Carville always rings true. People vote their pocketbooks. The economy has the lowest unemployment rate since the 1960s. The Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is growing at its highest level in years. Tax cuts helped many, (but not all). However, in recent weeks the financial markets have fluctuated wildly. The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped sharply on several days, only to rebound. There are jitters out there, but overall: “Advantage Republicans.”
“The Health of Health Care” – The one sector of the economy that continues to grow at an inflationary pace is health care. Republicans keep promising if they control the House and the Senate after Election Day, there will be another attempt to repeal and replace Obama Care. But Democrats continue to argue that millions of people with pre-existing conditions will lose coverage. In West Virginia for example, an estimated 800,000 of the 1.8 million residents, have a pre-existing condition. Democrats nationwide have stoked a lot of fear and concern that millions will lose medical coverage and it’s resonating with voters. True or not: “Advantage Democrats.”
“National Security” – Former President Bill Clinton always talked about peace and prosperity as the two most important factors in a reelection campaign. If people are working and stable financially, that’s a good thing. If the world is at relative peace and threats from overseas are abated, people feel safe and secure. The party in power usually gets the credit, or the blame. As mentioned, many economic indicators are cooking and threats from overseas are quiet. Grade: “Advantage Republicans.”
“Immigration Nation” – President Trump’s signature issue, and maybe the main reason he got elected, was immigration reform. No, the wall has not been built (and may never be), but right now this issue is again volatile. With a caravan of thousands of Central Americans trying to make their way to the U.S. border, there could be trouble. While the President has ordered 5,000 troops to guard the border, it’s unlikely the group will be here by Tuesday. Right now, “Advantage Republicans.” On the other hand, if others make it to the border and we see any extent of family separation, then all bets are off. The last thing this White House needs is more video of children being taken from their parents. Grade: “Standstill but Wait and See.”
“Immigration by Birthright.” – President Trump is talking about issuing an Executive Order to end the practice of granting legal citizenship to anyone born on U.S. soil, even if to illegal immigrant parents. He calls it a “crazy policy.” The problem is, it’s not a policy. It’s a Constitutional Amendment. Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” I predict if he signs an Executive Order, there will immediately be an objection filed in federal court, and an injunction will be granted preventing the implementation. “Advantage: the U.S. Constitution.”
“Birthright Citizenship be Gone?” – Make no mistake, the Fourteenth Amendment may be flawed. In hindsight, maybe it wasn’t a good idea to declare automatic citizenship by birth. I leave that to my fellow citizens to decide. But if it’s bad policy, there’s only one way to change it and that’s by amending the Constitution again, which is a process reserved - in part - to Congress, the states, and the citizens. The Constitution grants no power to amend the document to the Executive Branch of government, or the Judicial Branch. Amending the Constitution is by design very difficult. Other than the first ten amendments known as the Bill of Rights - approved with the original document - the U.S. Constitution has only been amended 17 times in 242 years.
“2016 Backlash?” – From the day Donald Trump was elected two years ago, opponents have been promising to upend his agenda and reverse the election in the 2018 midterms and ultimately in his 2020 reelection bid. There have been marches on Washington, D.C., and in many other cities across the United States. There has been public outcry over his second Supreme Court appointment, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and that this election might be a backlash. But a total national revolt and shaming of the Trump agenda? I don’t think so. If there is peace and prosperity Americans have a historic pattern with staying the course, no matter the party in charge. “Advantage: Two-Thirds Republican; to One-Third Democrats.” Read on to see why.
“My Predictions” -- I will stay with my prognostications from a few weeks ago. Republicans will have a net gain of three seats in the U.S. Senate, increasing their majority to 54 to 46. On the other hand, Democrats will take control of the House of Representatives with a narrow 221 to 214 majority.
“Is Divided Government Bad?” – The short answer is no. You will hear next Tuesday night and in the following days, predictions in the media of government gridlock. Yet in my lifetime, I remember two distinct periods when divided power worked well. In the 1980 Ronald Reagan landslide, Republicans not only took the White House, but seized control of the Senate as well, while Democrats held the House. Collectively, they got a lot done. Fast forward to 1995-96 when Democrat Bill Clinton was in the White House with Republicans controlling both chambers of Congress. It was the most productive time in Clinton’s term. A lot got done – including the most recent balanced federal budget. “Advantage: The Nation.” We’ll see if history repeats.
Mark Curtis, Ed.D., is Chief Political Reporter for the five Nexstar Media TV stations serving West Virginia, its five surrounding states and the District of Columbia.
- The Politics of Civility - or the Lack Thereof—Sunday Political Brunch July 1, 2018
- The Perils of a Political Strategy Disconnect - Sunday Political Brunch June 24, 2018
- “Come See About Me” - The Supreme Court Picks—Sunday Political Brunch July 8, 2018
- The Politics of Finesse, 2018 Style - The Sunday Political Brunch - July 15
- Do You Get “Do-Overs” in Politics?—Sunday Political Brunch - July 22, 2018
- Some Presidential Father’s Day Trivia—The Sunday Political Brunch—June 17, 2018
- The California Political Earthquake? - Sunday Political Brunch - June 10, 2018
- A Primary Post Mortem—The Sunday Political Brunch—May 13, 2018
- The Policy of Speak Softly May be Dead—Sunday Political Brunch—May 20, 2018
- Where’s the “Blue Wave?” – Sunday Political Brunch May 27, 2018
- The Political Dog Daze of Summer—Sunday Political Brunch June 3, 2018
- Do Sharp Elbows Spike Poll Numbers?—Sunday Political Brunch July 29, 2018
- “The 100 Day Dash to Election Day”—The Sunday Political Brunch August 5, 2018
- Evaluating the Supreme Court Standoff—Sunday Political Brunch - September 30, 2018
- The Kavanaugh Court Complexities—Sunday Political Brunch September 23, 2018
- “Is the Trump Political Bubble About to Burst?”—Sunday Political Brunch—October 7, 2018
- Of Political Odds and Ends—The Sunday Political Brunch October 14, 2018
- “Race to the Primary Finish Line” - Sunday Political Brunch September 16, 2018
- “A Summer of Political Drama Heads to Fall” - Sunday Political Brunch - September 9, 2018
- “The Red Tide vs The Blue Wave”—Sunday Political Brunch August 12, 2018
- A Topsy-Turvy Week of Political Hodge-Podge - Sunday Political Brunch - August 19, 2018
- A Week of Political Ups and Downs—Sunday Political Brunch August 26, 2018
- Remembering my Journeys with Senator McCain—Sunday Political Brunch Sept. 2, 2018