Welcome! Login | Register
 

Dunkin’ Donuts Tops List for ‘Most Significant’ Chain Restaurant in Massachusetts—Dunkin' Donuts was named the "most significant restaurant…

Dale LePage and the Manhattans CD Release Party September 4—Ceres Bistro at the Beechwood Hotel will host…

Gronkowski “Good to Go” Week 1—Rob Gronkowski told reporters at Gillette Stadium that…

Guest MINDSETTER™ Warren Tolman: Candidate for Attorney General—This race for Attorney General is about leadership.…

Smart Benefits: Two Regs Issued on Contraceptive Coverage—Two regulations on contraceptive coverage were recently issued…

College Admissions: 8 Things They Won’t Tell You in Freshman Orientation—As families pack suitcases and head off to…

Junior League of Worcester Kicked Off 90th Year With a Move—The Junior League of Worcester (JLW) and its…

Fall Activities for the Whole Family—Mark your calendars for the best activities of…

The Urban Gardener: Harvesting Green Beans + Sunflowers—Gardening made simple...

Worcester Pride to Host First Annual Youth Dance—Worcester Pride will host its first annual youth…

 
 

Worcester Stands to Lose $100K More on May Street Property

Saturday, May 25, 2013

 

The 5 May Street saga continues, following a recent call for bids that yielded a single bid for $70K.

The City of Worcester stands to lose another $130,000 on 5 May Street, as a recent call for bids on the embroiled property yielded just one result listed on the City's website from Gold Star Builders for $70,000 -- after the City had purchased the property at auction in February 2013 for $200,000.

The recent bid, which hasn't yet been awarded following the May 15th close date, continues the financial troubles of the property, which was assessed at $764,000 at the February auction.

At that time, the 15,000 square foot building was transferred from 5 May Street, LLC, who had purchased the property in 2010 for $435,000, to an auctioneer, following foreclosure proceedings. The action was taken after 5 May Street, LLC failed to complete the renovation project that had been made possible by the City, who had secured more than $2.3 million in state and federal funds.

The property was assessed in February at $764,000. At the February auction, the city's bid eclipsed the $135,000 offer made by developer Russell Haims.

Developers Weigh In

GoLocal spoke with Haims this week, who said that while he went through a walk-though again at the second auction, he ultimately decided against another bid.

"Luckily, I wasn't the winning bidder back in February," said Haims. "It still presents the same issues -- lack of dumpster for trash, parking. If I couldn't meet the expectations put forth by the bid, I wouldn't want to get involved with something that wasn't successful."

Haims noted that he was in the process of completing a project in the neighborhood, in which he converted an old church into a 12 unit building. "I've worked a lot in the area, and this [church project] is a historic gem."

"Gold Star Builders may very well have a plan to turn it around, and I wish them luck," said Haim. "I know that folks will continue to watch how things develop at the property, given everything that has happened to date."

Similarly, Tony Nguyen with Gold Star Builders knows the area well, and had plans to turn the unit into low-income housing through Worcester Affordable Housing Rentals.

When asked if he was surprised to be listed as the only bidder, Nguyen said, "Yes." Nguyen hadn't been part of the auction process in February, just the recent round, he said.

"I expect that we will have to put around $450,000 to $600,000" to renovate the building, Nguyen said, which was the reason why his bid was at the level he proposed.

Affordable Housing to Be Considered by Council

Next month, the Worcester City Council's Economic Development Committee is expected to take up affordable housing reports by consultants undertaken last year.  

"The 5 May Street issue had everything to do with bad management by [5 May Street LLC], not the city," said Worcester City Council Member Frederick Rushton, who noted that Council would be looking closely at ways to address housing issues in the city next month, starting at the Committee level.

"There's not a one-size fits all approach," said Rushton. "We'll hear from people that want housing to be market rate only, those who want an increase in affordable housing. There will be a number of views voiced, and we'll work towards crafting the best policy for Worcester."

"The idea is to bring this study in front of the Council and residents. The folks that did the study will be doing a presentation on their findings. That's when we'll start to have an idea of where we're going, to speculate now would be premature."

City Council Member Konstantina Lukes, who did not want to comment on the current situation facing 5 May Street, did say that housing issues in the city needed to be addressed.

"As you know, the housing study will be taken up at the committee level next month. The process ought to be reviewed, especially for more checks and balances," said Lukes.

In a letter presented along the initial study findings to the City Council last fall, City Manager Michael O'Brien wrote, "Our revitalization efforts must be undertaken in a much bolder, strategic way through unprecedented public-private partnerships – in a block by block, street by street, house by house manner. These efforts will require us to re-direct Federal, State and City resources and private dollars must be brought to bear to address entire streets at one time. We must use this opportunity to revisit our existing policies and funding priorities."

 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

 

You Must be Logged In to Comment