Friday Financial Five – July 18th, 2014
Friday, July 18, 2014
ETFs and hedge funds approach new thresholds
States with no income tax and population growth
Many industries are shifting to telecommuting, allowing employees to choose where they live and work remotely. While no individual factor usually determines where people choose to live, state income tax may play a larger role. There are currently seven states with no state individual income tax. They are Wyoming, Washington, Texas, South Dakota, Nevada, Florida, and Alaska. Looking at the most recent growth rates by state from April of 2010 to July of 2013, all seven appear in the top eleven states ranked by percentage population growth. In a rising tax environment, expect that trend to continue.
Top 1 percent may actually be richer than reported
There’s more good news for the top 1 percent of U.S. households. According to a European Central Bank economist, Philip Vermeulen, they actually own a greater percentage of the country’s total wealth than is typically reported. The 2010 U.S. Survey of Consumer Finances estimated top earners have 34 percent of the nation’s wealth. Vermeulen’s estimate incorporates what he considers “missed data,” driving that number closer to 37 percent. The change is even greater for the European countries made part of the study.
Trust as an IRA beneficiary
Another recent IRS ruling highlights issues that may arise when a trust is named as an IRA beneficiary. If family members start questioning provisions of the trust, this can lead to legal action. In the example presented by the recent IRS ruling, legal wrangling led a widow to miss the 60 day window for rolling the IRA assets into her own IRA. This meant the entire distribution was taxable and may have led to a penalty for excess contribution. Trusts can have a place as an IRA beneficiary, but must be done with forethought and consideration to avoid potential pitfalls.
The evolving NBA economy
The offseason in the National Basketball Association is always entertaining. The latest collective bargaining agreement intended to prevent top stars from colluding but seems to have had a side effect. The best players are no longer maximizing their value, while teams, having money to spend, are overpaying for lesser talents. Dwyane Wade opted out of a $40 million contract when his fair market value isn’t anywhere close to that. Dirk Nowitzki took a hometown discount and then his team signed an inferior player to a contract paying $5 million more per year. Should the NBA investigate the possibility of a “wink-wink” post-retirement office deal? Or should the players’ union get involved and try to prevent a player from opting out of a contract that conventional wisdom determines is a bad financial decision?
Dan Forbes is a regular contributor on financial issues. He is a CFP Board Ambassador. He leads the firm Forbes Financial Planning, Inc in Providence, RI and can be reached at [email protected].
Related Articles
- Friday Financial Five – July 4th, 2014
- Friday Financial Five – June 27, 2014
- Friday Financial Five – June 20th, 2014
- Friday Financial Five – June 13th, 2014
- Friday Financial Five, May 30, 2014
- Friday Financial Five – May 23rd, 2014
- Friday Financial Five – May 16th, 2014
- Friday Financial Five – May 9th, 2014
- Friday Financial Five – April 25th, 2014
- Friday Financial Five – April 18th, 2014
- Friday Financial Five—April 11th, 2014
- Friday Financial Five – April 4th, 2014
- Friday Financial Five – March 28th, 2014
- Friday Financial Five – March 21st, 2014
- Friday Financial Five – March 14th, 2014
- Friday Financial Five – March 7th, 2014
- Friday Financial Five – February 28th, 2014
- Friday Financial Five – February 21st, 2014
- Friday Financial Five – February 14th, 2014
- Friday Financial Five – February 7, 2014
- Friday Financial Five – January 31st, 2014
- Friday Financial Five – January 24th, 2014
- Friday Financial Five – January 17th, 2014
- Friday Financial Five – January 3rd, 2014
Follow us on Pinterest Google + Facebook Twitter See It Read It