Leonardo Angiulo: Legal Lessons From The Salem State Stabbings
Monday, October 07, 2013
Okay, so let's talk some practicalities. How is it that a person can get all the way to New York and still get arrested? Well, you see, there's thing called the “internet” and it allows people to exchange information. In fact, the internet has allowed law enforcement all over the country to connect through a database known as the Warrant Management System. So in almost every police car is a laptop with a database that helps officers do a nationwide search of a person's name instantaneously. All it takes is one routine traffic stop, or a random inquiry at a bus station, for a fugitive's luck to turn bad.
And things certainly can go bad. Once the arrest occurs, a person will typically be held at the local house of correction while the state where they are wanted organizes the appropriate paperwork. In legal parlence, the appropriate paperwork includes things called Governor's warrants and relies on statutes that are pretty dense. As in dense enough to include sentences like “the governor may agree with the executive authority of such other state for the interstate rendition of such person before the conclusion of such proceedings or of his term of sentence in such other state, upon such conditions relative to the return of such person to such other state at the expense of this commonwealth as may be agreed upon between the governor and the executive authority of such other state.” Which is the long way of saying the governor's office and the other state have authority to negotiate the price of transporting defendants.
The winding bureaucracy that goes into shipping someone back from another state is further proof that the founder's use of “E Pluribus Unum” as the national motto wasn't just for posterity. It feels as if each state really is its own nation when it comes to the court system. For that reason the Feds have stepped in to promote regularity and fairness in interstate rendition. The Interstate Agreement on Detainers was also enacted by Congress in an effort, I suspect, to give lawyers something to do.
All joking aside, the benefit to a layer of federal standards on top of state regulations is so disputes over the return of prisoners is minimized. I'm not sure if you heard this or not, but there tends to be some cultural differences from place to place in the United States. Things that are a crime in one state may not be in another.
Take, for example, the idea of physician assisted suicide. There are some people who feel very strongly in support of this option and strong beliefs have a way of spurring activism, even in the face of such behavior being illegal as it is in Massachusetts. If there was such an activist physician engaging in proscribed behavior in Boston, they would be subject to our criminal justice system. Even if said doctor fled to Portland, Oregon where Physician Assisted Suicide is legal, they would still be accountable to the Massachusetts courts. It doesn't matter whether the behavior complained of is legal where the fugitive runs to. The only question is whether another state has issued a valid warrant and is willing to pay to ship the fugitive back.
There are many times when we get lulled into thinking that we are at the most advanced stage of human development. That everything that came before was just a quaint effort by yesterday's people to deal with the world as they knew it. Why should we have to issue Governor's warrants to bring a person to justice? Like, why can't we check his prints and send him back where he came from on the next flight out of Logan? Let's just consider, for a moment, that computer databases are very easy to manipulate. And even if you don't want to give in to paranoia, there are plenty of things that could go wrong that don't involve shadow conspiracies. What if your social security number is one digit away from a very bad person doing very bad things? And what if you are driving the kids home from soccer practice when an officer does a random license plate check and suspects you have a warrant for a bank robbery in North Dakota? I bet you'd be a lot happier that there is a long and involved extradition process for interstate transport then.
Related Articles
- Leonardo Angiulo: Criminal Justice—What The TV Shows Leave Out
- Leonardo Angiulo: Surviving Party Season With Your Teenager
- Leonardo Angiulo: What You May Not Know About The DOMA Decision
- Leonardo Angiulo: How Much Privacy Did You Lose This Week? A Lot.
- Leonardo Angiulo: Swearing To Tell The Truth Means Something
- Leonardo Angiulo: What’s Next For America’s Voting Rights Act
- Leonardo Angiulo: How To Survive Tax Day (and Stay Out of Jail)
- Leonardo Angiulo: The Importance of Filling out Financial Statements in Probate Court
- Leonardo Angiulo: Who Wins in the NFL Concussion Settlement?
- Leonardo Angiulo: ‘Self-Defense’ and Massachusetts Law
- Leonardo Angiulo: MA Supreme Court Brings Wiretapping To Your Cellphone
- Leonardo Angiulo: The Royal Baby + Your Estate Planning
- Leonardo Angiulo: Why We Don’t Have The Death Penalty In Mass.
- Leonardo Angiulo: A New Law That Will Let You Have More E-Privacy
- Leonardo Angiulo: Mass. Takes 17 Year Olds Off The Criminal Hook
- Leonardo Angiulo: The Steroid Defense For Murder?
- Leonardo Angiulo: Aaron Hernandez Should Probably Lawyer Up
- Leonardo Angiulo: Massachusetts Family Sees Justice After 40 Years
- Leonardo Angiulo: This Is Our City, You Play By Our Rules
- Leonardo Angiulo: Auto Accidents + Recovering Damages
- Leonardo Angiulo: Putting A Price On Wrongful Death
- Leonardo Angiulo: Two Supreme Court Rulings That Seem Like Sci-Fi
- Leonardo Angiulo: Can A Minor Be Arrested For Cyberbullying?
- Leonardo Angiulo: Something To Be Proud Of On Independence Day
- Leonardo Angiulo: What Happens To Digital Property When You Die?
Follow us on Pinterest Google + Facebook Twitter See It Read It