Hundreds of Millions Invested in Minor League Baseball Has Not Helped Attendance
Friday, May 01, 2015
A failure to strike a deal could create an opportunity for Worcester and other cities around New England.
Over the past 20 years, billions in private and public money have been invested in minor league baseball stadiums across the United States. The promise has been that the stadiums will spark attendance and help ignite economic growth for those communities.
A GoLocal review of the teams in the league that the Pawtucket Red Sox compete in - the 14-team International League — shows that despite nearly hundreds of millions spent on new stadiums and improvements, league attendance over the past ten years has remained virtually flat.
During the past decade, total league attendance has increased per game by just over 4.5%. There seems to be no correlation between upgrades and new stadiums and increased attendance.
“We have our fiscal train wreck coming in three years, when the casinos are up and running in Massachusetts. We'll have a large per drop in tax revenue in the state -- we have to be extra careful with what we do,” said Len Lardaro, Professor of Economics at the University of Rhode Island.
Pawtucket has realized nearly $30 million in costs for upgrades (costs plus debt service) and all funded by Rhode Island taxpayers, yet despite the improvements, Pawtucket’s per game attendance has dropped over the past decade.
In 2005, the PawSox averaged 9,561 attendees per game. Last year, that number had dropped by nearly 30% to 7,367.
Correspondingly, the Louisville franchise - the Louisville Bats — is another example of a team that saw an initial boost and then a decline.
Louisville Slugger Field, home of the Bats, moved into a new stadium in 2000 and in 2005, the team averaged 9,182 attendees a game - second highest average attendance in the International League.
In 2014, the Louisville team’s average attendance had dropped to 7,990 - a 15% decrease. The Louisville Slugger Field stadium cost $40 million.
“It is very unlikely that subsidies for AAA baseball stadiums can be justified based on any tangible economic outcomes related to games. Most of the economic activity generated by professional sports is simply consumer spending that would have occurred somewhere else in the community at some other time,” said Brad Humphreys, Professor of Economics at West Virginia University.
For Durham, North Carolina, a new stadium bolstered the Durham Bulls attendance, but just slightly. In 2014, nearly $20 million was spent upgrading the Durham Bulls Athletic Facility. Despite the significant investment in improving the park, attendance increased only marginally. In 2005, the Durham Bulls average per game attendance was 7,227 and in 2014 - the first season after the renovations - per game attendance only increased to 7,615 — a 5.3% increased.
The Toledo Mud Hens opened a new stadium in 2002 at a cost of just under $40 million. Attendance at the Mud Hen games has also decreased. In 2005, the Mud Hens hosted on average 7,845 per game and in 2014 it dropped to 7,680.
“An AAA team simply concentrates consumer spending in a very visible place. If you removed the team from the area, those entertainment dollars would have been spent elsewhere in the area. So the subsidies just move consumer spending around,” said Humphreys.
Holy Cross Professor Victor Matheson raised serious questions about the demands of these minor league teams asking for government investment. “Given the landscape, how can new owners justify asking for public dollars to support a minor league stadium?”
“They can't,” Matheson continued. “Or maybe, they can ask all they want, but government officials looking to make the wisest use of taxpayer dollars should resist the call.”
Overall, despite the investment of hundred of millions in new stadiums and renovations, International League parks have only seen incremental attendance improvement - the increase per game is less than 400 fans per game.
“And it's not just about the net levels -- it's opportunity costs. What's the value in its next best use of that 195 land? It's more that a $1 a year -- you have to validly count what it could have been, and that would be in the tens of millions,” said Lardaro.
Related Slideshow: 10 Things That Need to Happen to Get PawSox to Worcester
Related Articles
- City Councilors Make Pitch for PawSox to Come to Worcester
- 10 Things That Need to Happen to Get PawSox to Worcester
- Bravehearts Playoff Tickets On Sale Now
- Worcester Bravehearts Clobber Seacoast Mavericks, Improve to 5-0
- Worcester Bravehearts Unveil Brand New Mascot
- Worcester Bravehearts To Host Fan Fest
- Worcester Bravehearts to Host ‘Heart Stove’ for Boys and Girls Club
- Bravehearts Release Schedule, Futures League Makes Changes
- Bob Lobel: Why We Don’t Want Players Like Jose Canseco
- Local Officials Work to Secure New Ownership for Tornadoes
- Worcester Tornadoes: Top Stories in Central Mass in 2012
- NEW: Can-Am League Terminates Tornadoes’ Membership
- Where in Worcester are the Tornadoes?
- NEW: Tornadoes’ Office Cleaned Out; More Lawsuits on the Way?
- Tornadoes’ Colabello Makes Twins’ Double-A Team
- It’s All About Baseball for Jose Canseco… No, Really
- NEW: Tornadoes Introduce Newly Signed Canseco
- BREAKING: Tornadoes Sign Canseco
- Another no-hitter? Canseco was right!
- NEW: Is Canseco Leaving the Tornadoes?
- Canseco’s Most Entertaining Tweets Since Coming to Worcester
- NEW: Canseco No Longer With Tornadoes
- A Look at Canseco’s Bankruptcy Documents
- NEW: Canseco to Write Weekly Column; Discusses Aurora Shooting
- NEW: Canseco Files for Bankruptcy
- Bravehearts Announce Fan Fest Date, Set for Season
- Worcester Bravehearts Get Set to Start Season
- Worcester Bravehearts ‘Heart Stove’ Event Draws 350 to Boys and Girls Club
- Worcester Bravehearts Announce First Half of Roster for 2015
- Bravehearts Add Five Impact Players to Roster
Follow us on Pinterest Google + Facebook Twitter See It Read It