John Monfredo: Worcester’s New Plan to Attack Chronic Absenteeism
Email to a friend
Permalink
Saturday, November 30, 2013
John Monfredo, GoLocalWorcester Education Contributor
If we are to address the achievement gap in education, the first place to start is with attendance issues, believes John Monfredo.
Our nation’s education system is based on the supposition that barring illness or an unexpected event, students are in class every school day. So strong is this assumption that it is not even measured. It is a very rare that the state education department, school district or principal can tell you how many students have missed 10% or more of the school year or in the previous year missed a month or more of school… two common definitions of chronic absence.
A Serious Issue
This issue is quite serious and now has caught national attention for students need to attend school daily to succeed. Achievement, especially in math, is very sensitive to attendance and in addition absence affects standardized test scores, graduation and dropout rates. If we are to address the achievement gap in education, the first place to start is with attendance issues.
Keep in mind that a school can have an average daily attendance of 90% and still have 40% of its students chronically absent, because on different days, different students make up that 90%. The Worcester Public Schools, like all urban centers, does have pockets of chronic absenteeism. If we look at the overall statistics our Elementary Schools have an attendance rate of 95.2%, our Middle Schools have an attendance rate of 94.4% and our High Schools have a rate of 92.4%. Those figures look fine but when you delve into the data further you find that 15.2% of low-income students system-wide were absent over 10 percent of the time. Over all, in 2011, over 3,200 students were labeled as chronic absenteeism…absent more than 10% of the school year.
This week at the Worcester Public Schools standing committee on Teaching, Learning and Student Support, in an on-going item that I filed on chronic absenteeism this issue was addressed. Through the efforts of the Chief Academic Officer, Dr. Marco Rodrigues, a committee made up of partners within the community has been established and are addressing this issue. The group has been working diligently for the first step was to develop a strategic plan to include an Attendance Awareness Campaign to address this issue and ways to improve daily school attendance for all students.
Every School Day Counts Campaign
Starting in September the district launched a campaign entitled, “Attendance Matters…every school day counts!” A proclamation was introduced by Mayor Petty with the idea of the City of Worcester hoping to promote a “culture of attendance” amongst its students. All schools have informed families of the initiative and about building activities through monthly newsletters. Schools were provided with Attendance Works toolkits outlining ideas, and activities to address the issue of chronic absenteeism with parents and families. Another initiative within the district has been to establish an asthma pilot program with UMass to support families and students with asthma related issues and absences. This pilot will bring awareness by connecting existing asthma resources at schools and in the community to families in need.
In addition, Worcester Superintendent Boone sent a message to all students through the Connect-Ed message and to the media outlets emphasizing the importance and the benefits of daily attendance. The district is also exploring possibilities of having local leaders participate in Connect-Ed messages to families emphasizing the importance of daily school attendance throughout the year. Another means of spreading the message of the importance of daily school attendance will be through Public Service Announcements, local media outlets and signs on the WRTA buses.
At the meeting this week I also made three motions for administration to consider:
-
That we continue to flag students with chronic absenteeism, as part of the early warning system, and work with students and families in reducing the absence rate.
-
That we continue with our Public Relations awareness campaign on attendance.
-
That we have our schools, as part of their school improvement plan, to include strategies in addressing chronic absenteeism and set a bench mark on reducing the percentage of chronic absences at their schools.
My goal is that through this attendance campaign is to have all schools understand the purpose of the campaign on chronic absenteeism and have them be pro-active in addressing the issue. Hopefully, let’s consider to utilize school attendance incentives such as attendance ceremonies, special trips for those students with high attendance and rewarding parents whose children regularly attend.
Consequences of Missing School
The bottom line is that missing school matters a great deal, especially to our low income students. Because students reared in poverty benefit the most from being in school, one of the most effective strategies for providing pathways out of poverty is to do what it takes to get these students in school every day. This alone, even without improvements in the education system, will drive up achievement, high school graduation, and college attainment rates.
The research is in and as Hedy Chang, director of the nationwide Attendance Works program stated at a conference to educators, "You want to improve test scores? Get your kids to show up.” She went on to say, "You can innovate all you want, but if the kid’s not there, the benefit from the innovation is going to have limited impact." This may seem obvious, but the overwhelming data about under-performing schools and the failures of the public schools can lead people to believe that missing some school days won’t matter much. But the emerging evidence argues the opposite.
Other research states… Children who are chronically absent in the pre-k and first grade have lower second grade test scores and are less likely to read proficiently in grade three and for children who attend kindergarten less than 80% of the time only 45% are proficient in reading and 46% in math at grade three.
Therefore, let’s keep the “fire burning” on this all-important issue for the good news is if we do measure and monitor absenteeism there is quite a bit that can be done to improve it with existing resources. It has to be an all out community effort to make sure that our students are ready, willing, and able to attend school every day. Let’s all be part of the solution!
Related Slideshow: Central MA School Districts with the Highest Teacher Evaluations
During the 2012-2013 school year, Race to the Top (RTTT) districts in Massachusetts were required to implement the new Educator Evaluation framework with at least 50 percent of their educators district-wide. Of Central Massachusetts’s 52 school districts, 26 implemented the Educator Evaluation structure. These 26 school districts are listed below ranked from the lowest teacher evaluation score to the highest. Keep reading to see where your district’s teachers rank, as well as to view the state and regional averages.
Prev
Next
State Average
Teacher Scoring Breakdown:
Percentage with exemplary scores: 7.4%
Percentage with proficient scores: 85.2%
Percentage that need improvement: 6.8%
Percentage with unsatisfactory scores: 0.7%
Sample Details:
Number of educators to be evaluated: 37,940
Total number of educators evaluated: 61,441
Prev
Next
Central MA Average
Teacher Scoring Breakdown:
Percentage with exemplary scores: 5.1%
Percentage with proficient scores: 88.2%
Percentage that need improvement: 6.4%
Percentage with unsatisfactory scores: 0.04%
Sample Details:
Number of educators to be evaluated: 8,843
Total number of educators evaluated: 5,987
Prev
Next
#26 Quaboag
Teacher Scoring Breakdown:
Percentage with exemplary scores: 6.3%
Percentage with proficient scores: 75.0%
Percentage that need improvement: 18.8%
Percentage with unsatisfactory scores: 0.0%
Sample Details:
Number of educators to be evaluated: 131
Total number of educators evaluated: 80
Prev
Next
#25 Oxford
Teacher Scoring Breakdown:
Percentage with exemplary scores: 8.7%
Percentage with proficient scores: 73.9%
Percentage that need improvement: 17.4%
Percentage with unsatisfactory scores: 0.0%
Sample Details:
Number of educators to be evaluated: 168
Total number of educators evaluated: 46
Prev
Next
#24 Uxbridge
Teacher Scoring Breakdown:
Percentage with exemplary scores: 0.0%
Percentage with proficient scores: 84.2
Percentage that need improvement: 15.8%
Percentage with unsatisfactory scores: 0.0%
Sample Details:
Number of educators to be evaluated: 162
Total number of educators evaluated: 19
Prev
Next
#23 Fitchburg
Teacher Scoring Breakdown:
Percentage with exemplary scores: 8.6%
Percentage with proficient scores: 77.3%
Percentage that need improvement: 13.3%
Percentage with unsatisfactory scores: 0.9%
Sample Details:
Number of educators to be evaluated: 456
Total number of educators evaluated: 233
Prev
Next
#22 Westborough
Teacher Scoring Breakdown:
Percentage with exemplary scores: 1.5%
Percentage with proficient scores: 86.6%
Percentage that need improvement: 10.4%
Percentage with unsatisfactory scores: 1.5%
Sample Details:
Number of educators to be evaluated: 335
Total number of educators evaluated: 67
Prev
Next
#21 Lunenburg
Teacher Scoring Breakdown:
Percentage with exemplary scores: 1.4%
Percentage with proficient scores: 87.7%
Percentage that need improvement: 10.9%
Percentage with unsatisfactory scores: 0.0%
Sample Details:
Number of educators to be evaluated: 1,209
Total number of educators evaluated: 495
Prev
Next
#20 North Brookfield
Teacher Scoring Breakdown:
Percentage with exemplary scores: 2.7%
Percentage with proficient scores: 86.5%
Percentage that need improvement: 10.8%
Percentage with unsatisfactory scores: 0.0%
Sample Details:
Number of educators to be evaluated: 59
Total number of educators evaluated: 37
Prev
Next
#19 Millbury
Teacher Scoring Breakdown:
Percentage with exemplary scores: 3.3%
Percentage with proficient scores: 87.9%
Percentage that need improvement: 6.6%
Percentage with unsatisfactory scores: 2.2%
Sample Details:
Number of educators to be evaluated: 158
Total number of educators evaluated: 91
Prev
Next
#18 Blacktone-Millville
Teacher Scoring Breakdown:
Percentage with exemplary scores: 10.6%
Percentage with proficient scores: 81.9%
Percentage that need improvement: 7.4%
Percentage with unsatisfactory scores: 0.0%
Sample Details:
Number of educators to be evaluated: 162
Total number of educators evaluated: 94
Prev
Next
#17 Southbridge
Teacher Scoring Breakdown:
Percentage with exemplary scores: 9.9%
Percentage with proficient scores: 83.6%
Percentage that need improvement: 5.9%
Percentage with unsatisfactory scores: 0.7%
Sample Details:
Number of educators to be evaluated: 212
Total number of educators evaluated: 152
Prev
Next
#16 Worcester
Teacher Scoring Breakdown:
Percentage with exemplary scores: 6.2%
Percentage with proficient scores: 87.7%
Percentage that need improvement: 5.6%
Percentage with unsatisfactory scores: 0.4%
Sample Details:
Number of educators to be evaluated: 1,859
Total number of educators evaluated: 1,825
Prev
Next
#15 Webster
Teacher Scoring Breakdown:
Percentage with exemplary scores: 10.9%
Percentage with proficient scores: 83.2%
Percentage that need improvement: 5.9%
Percentage with unsatisfactory scores: 0.0%
Sample Details:
Number of educators to be evaluated: 159
Total number of educators evaluated: 101
Prev
Next
#14 Hudson
Teacher Scoring Breakdown:
Percentage with exemplary scores: 3.9%
Percentage with proficient scores: 90.8%
Percentage that need improvement: 5.2%
Percentage with unsatisfactory scores: 0.0%
Sample Details:
Number of educators to be evaluated: 288
Total number of educators evaluated: 153
Prev
Next
#13 Gardner
Teacher Scoring Breakdown:
Percentage with exemplary scores: 3.3%
Percentage with proficient scores: 91.7%
Percentage that need improvement: 5.0%
Percentage with unsatisfactory scores: 0.0%
Sample Details:
Number of educators to be evaluated: 227
Total number of educators evaluated: 120
Prev
Next
#12 Dudley-Charlton
Teacher Scoring Breakdown:
Percentage with exemplary scores: 6.5%
Percentage with proficient scores: 88.7%
Percentage that need improvement: 4.2%
Percentage with unsatisfactory scores: 0.6%
Sample Details:
Number of educators to be evaluated: 320
Total number of educators evaluated: 168
Prev
Next
#11 Northbridge
Teacher Scoring Breakdown:
Percentage with exemplary scores: 0.5%
Percentage with proficient scores: 95.5%
Percentage that need improvement: 4.0%
Percentage with unsatisfactory scores: 0.0%
Sample Details:
Number of educators to be evaluated: 229
Total number of educators evaluated: 200
Prev
Next
#10 Winchendon
Teacher Scoring Breakdown:
Percentage with exemplary scores: 0.7%
Percentage with proficient scores: 95.6%
Percentage that need improvement: 3.6%
Percentage with unsatisfactory scores: 0.0%
Sample Details:
Number of educators to be evaluated: 139
Total number of educators evaluated: 137
Photo: Flickr/AdmissionsQuest
Prev
Next
#9 Bellingham
Teacher Scoring Breakdown:
Percentage with exemplary scores: 1.0%
Percentage with proficient scores: 95.6%
Percentage that need improvement: 3.4%
Percentage with unsatisfactory scores: 0.0%
Sample Details:
Number of educators to be evaluated: 215
Total number of educators evaluated: 206
Prev
Next
#8 Quabbin
Teacher Scoring Breakdown:
Percentage with exemplary scores: 4.5%
Percentage with proficient scores: 92.5%
Percentage that need improvement: 2.5%
Percentage with unsatisfactory scores: 0.5%
Sample Details:
Number of educators to be evaluated: 207
Total number of educators evaluated: 199
Prev
Next
#7 Grafton
Teacher Scoring Breakdown:
Percentage with exemplary scores: 0.0%
Percentage with proficient scores: 97.2%
Percentage that need improvement: 2.8%
Percentage with unsatisfactory scores: 0.0%
Sample Details:
Number of educators to be evaluated: 253
Total number of educators evaluated: 178
Prev
Next
#6 Ralph C. Maher
Teacher Scoring Breakdown:
Percentage with exemplary scores: 2.6%
Percentage with proficient scores: 94.7%
Percentage that need improvement: 2.6%
Percentage with unsatisfactory scores: 0.0%
Sample Details:
Number of educators to be evaluated: 79
Total number of educators evaluated: 76
Prev
Next
#5 Marlborough
Teacher Scoring Breakdown:
Percentage with exemplary scores: 0.9%
Percentage with proficient scores: 96.2%
Percentage that need improvement: 2.8%
Percentage with unsatisfactory scores: 0.0%
Sample Details:
Number of educators to be evaluated: 434
Total number of educators evaluated: 423
Prev
Next
#3 Auburn (Tied)
Teacher Scoring Breakdown:
Percentage with exemplary scores: 0.0%
Percentage with proficient scores: 99.1%
Percentage that need improvement: 0.9%
Percentage with unsatisfactory scores: 0.0%
Sample Details:
Number of educators to be evaluated: 202
Total number of educators evaluated: 116
Prev
Next
#3 Leominster (Tied)
Teacher Scoring Breakdown:
Percentage with exemplary scores: 0.0%
Percentage with proficient scores: 99.1%
Percentage that need improvement: 0.9%
Percentage with unsatisfactory scores: 0.0%
Sample Details:
Number of educators to be evaluated: 523
Total number of educators evaluated: 332
Prev
Next
#2 Wachusett
Teacher Scoring Breakdown:
Percentage with exemplary scores: 29.1%
Percentage with proficient scores: 70.3%
Percentage that need improvement: 0.6%
Percentage with unsatisfactory scores: 0.0%
Sample Details:
Number of educators to be evaluated: 534
Total number of educators evaluated: 334
Prev
Next
#1 Douglas
Teacher Scoring Breakdown:
Percentage with exemplary scores: 9.5%
Percentage with proficient scores: 90.5%
Percentage that need improvement: 0.0%
Percentage with unsatisfactory scores: 0.0%
Sample Details:
Number of educators to be evaluated: 123
Total number of educators evaluated: 105
Related Articles
Enjoy this post? Share it with others.
Email to a friend
Permalink
Follow us on Pinterest Google + Facebook Twitter See It Read It