Welcome! Login | Register
 

Finneran: Too Old, Too White, Too Male To Understand….—why parents would allow their young children---girls specifically---to…

Friday Financial Five – October 31st, 2014—Two positive developments this week include

The Cellar: Wines That Get Better With Time—Invest now and enjoy later....

Worcester Sharks Lose 3-4 to Portland Pirates—The Worcester Sharks (4-2-1-0, 9pts) fell to 2-2-1-0…

See Halloween Band Bash at the Worcester PopUp With Your Woo Card—Let Us WOO You Week of October 30th

Pulitzer-Winning Poet Laureate Trethewey to Speak at Clark—Pulitzer Prize-winner and recent U.S. Poet Laureate Natasha…

Auburn and Greendale Mall to Host Halloween Events—Auburn Mall and Greendale Mall will celebrate Halloween…

Central Mass Grown Receives $60,000 Grant—The Central Massachusetts Regional Planning Commission and the…

7 Reasons To Be Excited About The Celtics Season—Celtics season tips off tonight

Giorgio: Thoughts on the Midterm Senate Election—As we enter the final week of the…

 
 

Will Worcester Residents Be Forced To Adopt Smart Meters?

Tuesday, March 18, 2014

 

Will Worcester residents eventually be forced to have smart meters on their homes?

Worcester’s smart grid project has been a hot button debate topic. The privacy and safety of the system have been key issues since the project’s inception, but the ultimate question is whether or not customers who disapprove of the system will be able to opt out of the program when it finally comes to fruition.

The Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) system is a big part of the smart grid project, allowing for two-way communication between the meter and customers, utility companies, and even smart appliances. Although a huge technological breakthrough, providing consumers an opportunity to monitor and better control their energy usage, many are still opposed to the idea of this smart technology.

“The AMI system makes me nervous; I don’t want that junk,” said Peggy Patton, a member of activist group haltMAsmartmeters.org. “They are unsafe and could potentially cause fires. There are huge health concerns due to radiation. There also is no privacy; they know when you are home and what you are doing when you are there.”

Patton is openly opposed to all digital metering technologies, including the Automatic Meter Reading (AMR) system. An older system, the AMR differs from the AMI because it operates using only one-way communication. Its primary function is to allow for utility companies to read the meters faster by transmitting the usage data to the company. 

Patton recalls when NSTAR, her local electrical company, began installing the AMR systems in her neighborhood. Although she talked to the company and showed displeasure in the system, eventually she was forced to comply. 

“Several years ago, NSTAR began installing AMR systems in my area and I was opposed,” said Patton. “After two failed attempts to install the AMR system while I was home, NSTAR came to my house one week while I was away and installed it anyway. I called up the next day, but it appeared to me that they could care less.”

When reached out for comment, Mike Durand, a media contact for NSTAR, stated that the AMR systems have been used by NSTAR for the past 20+ years. Due to NSTAR using the AMR system as their industry standard, there is currently no opt out policy. 

“AMR is the industry standard; it’s just what we use,” said Durand. “The system uses radio technology from 40 years ago. As far as I know, we haven’t received a single complaint about AMR systems.”

Will There Be a Charge?

The AMI system is just the latest trend in smart technology taking over all facets of the consumer’s day-to-day lives, but will it follow in the AMR system’s footsteps by becoming the industry standard? Without an opt out policy, consumers will ultimately be forced to decide between a system that they don’t want and having no electricity at all.

National Grid - the utility company who has been working on the smart grid system for Worcester - says that the AMI systems are currently installed and that if a customer so desires, they can opt out of the pilot program at no additional charge by contacting customer service. Of the nearly 15,000 customers covered by the pilot area, around 1,000 have already opted out of the program. 

“We have been actively communicating with customers about the program since its beginning,” said Deborah Drew, a spokesperson for National Grid. “Customers in the program area were sent letters, had door hangers and were informed about meter installations. There also were many news articles on the program.”

National Grid may be offering customers an opportunity to opt out for free now, but what about in the future when the smart grid program really takes off? According to docket D.P.U. 13-83, National Grid has already petitioned to propose tariffs for installation or reinstallation of non-AMR systems as well as a reading fee for customers who choose to not use the AMR system. The docket states that the installation or reinstallation fee would be $26, while the monthly reading fee would be $11.

Although this applies to AMR systems more specifically than the newer AMI systems, it still shows that the company no longer wants to carry analog metering systems. Activist groups, including haltMAsmartmeters.org, feel as though it is only a matter of time before National Grid and other companies petition for harsher tariffs, forcing customers to choose between the smart grid program or no electricity at all.

Will National Grid eventually charge more to customers that keep analog metering systems?

“In my opinion, it is very insincere,” said Patricia Burke, who is also a member of the activist group haltMAsmartmeters.org. “In their pilot program, National Grid is offering a free opt out policy as a marketing ploy for their new system.”

H.2926

Whether or not National Grid, or other companies who decide to adopt the smart grid system in the future, choose to allow their customers to opt out of the system - whether for free, a fee, or not at all - is up for debate. Although the issue of opting out is rising to prominence, one bill can require utility companies to allow for customers to opt out of smart grid systems. 

The bill, H.2926, would be an amendment allowing for customers to choose which metering option would go on their home, allowing for customers to choose options that do not emit radio frequency electromagnetic radiation, even if that means removing a newer technology in favor of an older one. 

H.2926, which some are calling the Opt Out Bill, would also require written consent by the ratepayer in order to install an AMI system, as well as prohibiting utility companies from offering disincentives to ratepayers for not making the transition to an AMI system. The bill also points out that installation and use of AMI systems are not currently mandated by state or federal law. 

The bill, which is currently in the hands of the Joint Committee on Telecommunications, Utilities, and Energy, must be acted upon by March 19th. The committee will ultimately decide on whether the bill moves on to the next phase or if it will die in the committee. 

“This week is crucial [in regards to H.2926],” said Burke. “We really don’t want this bill to die. In other states, it wasn’t until after the system was installed that the communities realized how important an opt out policy was.”
 

 

Related Slideshow: Biggest Checks Written by the City of Worcester - January 2014

It takes a lot of money to run Worcester. See the city's biggest expenses in this collection of the largest checks written out to vendors.

Prev Next

25.

Behavioral Concepts

Vendor: Behavioral Concepts

Amount Paid: $239,300.93

Date Issued: 1/8/2014

Prev Next

24.

Dagle Electrical Construction

Vendor: Dagle Electrical Construction

Amount Paid: $246,201.72

Date Issued: 1/27/2014

Prev Next

23.

Dagle Electrical Construction

Vendor: Dagle Electrical Construction

Amount Paid: $265,163.91

Date Issued: 1/15/2014

Prev Next

22.

Blue Cross Blue Shield

Vendor: Blue Cross Blue Shield

Amount: $276,000.00

Date Issued: 1/10/2014

Prev Next

21.

National Grid

Vendor: National Grid

Amount Paid: $295,015.64

Date Issued: 1/27/2014

Prev Next

20.

H.M. Receivables Co. LLC

Vendor: HM Receivables Co. LLC

Amount Paid: $324,490.20

Date Issued: 1/13/2014

Prev Next

19.

Worcester Public Library Fund

Vendor: Worcester Public Library Fund

Amount Paid: $350,000.00

Date Issued: 1/24/2014

Prev Next

18.

Blue Cross Blue Shield

Vendor: Blue Cross Blue Shield

Amount: $375,006.48

Date Issued: 1/10/2014

Prev Next

17.

Fallon Community Health

Vendor: Fallon Community Health

Amount Paid: $393,448.75

Date Issued: 1/10/2014

Prev Next

16.

Worcester Health Insurance Trust

Vendor: Worcester Health Insurance Trust

Amount Paid: $487,730.23

Date Issued: 1/15/2014

Prev Next

15.

Worcester Health Insurance Trust

Vendor: Worcester Health Insurance Trust

Amount Paid: $546,045.00

Date Issued: 1/15/2014

Prev Next

14.

Central Massachusetts Special Services

Vendor: Central Massachusetts Special Services

Amount Paid: $726,297.20

Date Issued: 1/17/2014

Prev Next

13.

City Square Development Co. LLC

Vendor: City Square Development Co. LLC

Amount Paid: $755,578.68

Date Issued: 1/10/2014

Prev Next

12.

Fallon Community Health

Vendor: Fallon Community Health

Amount Paid: $768,850.42

Date Issued: 1/10/2014

Prev Next

11.

Durham School Services

Vendor: Durham School Services

Amount Paid: $867,939.51

Date Issued: 1/23/2014

Prev Next

10.

Caremark

Vendor: Caremark

Amount Paid: $1,000,000

Date Issued: 1/15/2014

Prev Next

9.

U.S. Bank

Vendor: U.S. Bank

Amount Paid: $1,102,830.88

Date Issued: 1/02/2014

Prev Next

8.

Blue Cross Blue Shield

Vendor: Blue Cross Blue Shield

Amount Paid: $1,125,013.69

Date Issued: 1/10/2014

Prev Next

7.

Consigli Construction

Vendor: Consigli Construction

Amount Paid: $1,147,126.15

Date Issued: 1/27/14

Prev Next

6.

Worcester Health Insurance Trust

Vendor: Worcester Health Insurance Trust

Amount: $1,375,614.90

Date Issued: 1/15/2014

Prev Next

5.

City Square II Development

Vendor: City Square II Development

Amount Paid: $1,422,488.60

Date Issued: 1/29/2014

Prev Next

4.

Fallon Community Health Plan

Vendor: Fallon Community Health Plan

Amount Paid: $2,306, 551.25

Date Issued: 1/10/2014

Prev Next

3.

Worcester Health Insurance Trust

Vendor: Worcester Health Insurance Trust

Amount Paid: $2,720,460.44

Date Issued: 1/15/2014

Prev Next

2.

U.S. Bank

Vendor: U.S. Bank

Amount Paid: $2,773,453.60

Date Issued: 1/02/14

Prev Next

1.

U.S. Bank

Vendor: U.S. Bank

Amount Paid: $9,105,608.90

Date Issued: 1/02/14

 
 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.