A “Big Price to Pay” for Syria
Tuesday, April 10, 2018
Just how many chances does the “animal” (as Mr. Trump says) Assad have? This is not the first time Mr. Assad used chemical weapons against his own people, nor the second; this sick, demented regime has routinely used horrific gas on its own people as a means to expedite the capture of specific cities; all the while, it typically refuses to let humanitarian workers visit these cities to care for the victims – many of whom are women and children.
The Syrian government must face some serious penalties. The United States should pause any thoughts of a troop withdrawal for the time being. Though an unpopular option, the Assad regime certainly cannot be trusted to govern in a humane fashion. The United States should also consider missile strikes on military targets – even if just symbolic -- in Syria as a tangible and visible penalty.
While Iran should take a lot of the blame, Russia is the main culprit. Russia is using Iranian proxy forces and private Russian contractors to combat the Islamic State terror group, and the U.S. backed Syrian rebels. Russia has become increasingly complicit in keeping the Syrian regime in power, shielding it from every pertinent United Nations Security Council Resolution.
The United States should look to undermine Iran and Russia. Whereas economic sanctions on both countries are a good idea, the United States has a responsibility to increase its lethal support to Ukraine to counter Russian-backed Ukrainian separatists’ gains. The United States should also increase military assistance to the Saudi-backed government in Yemen to dilute Iranian military support (while influencing the recognized Yemeni government to rein in lethal operations which brutally target civilians).
Holding all these countries accountable is critical to ensure the Syrian regime is deterred from any further gas attacks in the future. Syria is simply a pawn in a much larger and very lethal chess game played by both Iran and Russia. No one should seek a continuation of war, but these countries don’t seem to care too much for peace. These actions would be so fitting; they could just be considered "big" even by Mr. Trump's standards.
Related Articles
- Fecteau: The Name Game in Charlottesville
- Fecteau: Trump’s Nuke Bluff Backfired
- Fecteau: Trump Goes Obama-Lite in Afghanistan
- Fecteau: A Rare Moment of Bipartisanship
- Fecteau: Trump’s Pivot
- Fecteau: Chaos in The White House
- Fecteau: Tweets and Transgender Rights
- Fecteau: Democrats Lose Again
- Fecteau: Healthcare Bill from Hell
- Fecteau: The Rocket Man & the Dotard – Worried Yet?
- Fecteau: The Dumb & Dumber Approach to Healthcare
- Fecteau: I Think Trump’s Crazy Too
- Fecteau: Backlash at the Harvard Kennedy School
- Fecteau: Disrespecting Our Fallen Heroes
- Fecteau: Dear Mr. Trump, Decertify This
- Fecteau: End the War On Terror
- Fecteau: Moore’s Morality Matters
- Fecteau: Moore Madness From Trump
- Fecteau: The War Forward in Afghanistan – What Is It?
- Fecteau: Will Trump’s Rhetoric Help Rein in Gun Violence?
- Fecteau: Trump vs. the NFL
- Fecteau: A Federal Failure in Puerto Rico
- Fecteau: Don’t Scrap the Iran Nuclear Deal
- Fecteau: Talk About Gun Violence
- Fecteau: An Inspiring March Against Gun Violence
Follow us on Pinterest Google + Facebook Twitter See It Read It